Torres v. Saba et al
Filing
36
SCHEDULING ORDER (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/16/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARIO TORRES,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-06607-SI
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 34
MIKE HANSEN, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
The order of service and partial dismissal stated: “Discovery may be taken in accordance
14
with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No further court order under Federal Rule of Civil
15
Procedure 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16 is required before the parties may conduct discovery.”
16
Docket No. 21 at 12. Defendants now request an order under Rule 30(a)(2) permitting them to
17
take plaintiff’s deposition in prison. Docket No. 34. The request is DENIED as unnecessary
18
because the order of service and partial dismissal already gave them permission to take plaintiff’s
19
deposition. The parties are reminded that they are expected to closely read the court’s orders and
20
to comply with them.
21
Defendants indicate they intend to file a motion for summary judgment, and request that a
22
briefing schedule be set to allow the parties time to do discovery. Accordingly, the court now sets
23
the following new briefing schedule for a motion for summary judgment: Defendants must file
24
and serve their motion for summary judgment no later than August 10, 2018. Plaintiff must file
25
and serve on defense counsel his opposition to the motion for summary judgment no later than
26
September 7, 2018. Defendants must file and serve their reply brief (if any) no later than
27
September 21, 2018.
28
1
Defendants are reminded that any motion for summary judgment must be accompanied by
2
a Rand notice in a separate document at the time they file their motion for summary judgment.
3
See Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934, 939 (9th Cir. 2012); Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 960 (9th
4
Cir. 1998).
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 16, 2018
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?