Torres v. Saba et al
Filing
65
ORDER denying 64 Motion for Extension of Time to File. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/16/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
MARIO TORRES,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-06607-SI
ORDER
v.
Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 64
MIKE HANSEN, et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff’s request for an extension of the deadline to file a reply in support of his discovery
14
motion is DENIED as untimely. Docket No. 64. The court has already ruled on the discovery
15
motion; the court’s ruling on the discovery motion was made more than three weeks after defendants
16
filed their opposition brief and several days before plaintiff filed his request for an extension of the
17
deadline to file a reply.
18
Plaintiff’s request for a stay and abeyance is DENIED. Docket No. 63. As stated in the
19
order filed November 7, 2018, the court will entertain a joint request for a stay, see Docket No. 59
20
at 6, which plaintiff’s request is not.
21
Plaintiff has written to the court several times about difficulties obtaining his legal materials.
22
If plaintiff wants to complain about prison officials’ confiscation of his legal materials, he may file
23
a new civil rights action to do so. The defendants in the present action do not have custody of him
24
or determine what materials he may possess in prison.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 16, 2018
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?