California Restaurant Association v. City of Emeryville
Filing
13
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by California Restaurant Association. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 10, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Charles L. Post, State Bar No. 160443
Lukas J. Clary, State Bar No. 251519
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
LAW CORPORATION
400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: 916/558-6000
Facsimile:
916/446-1611
Email: cpost@weintraub.com
lclary@weintraub.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
California Restaurant Association
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
11
17
18
19
20
CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT
) Case No. 3:16-cv-06660-JST
ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual )
benefit corporation,
) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE PAGE
) LIMITS FOR: (1) CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff,
) RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION’S
)
v.
) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF
CITY OF EMERYVILLE, a California
) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
municipal corporation,
) INJUNCTION; AND (2) CITY OF
) EMERYVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO
Defendant.
) CRA’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
) INJUNCTION; PROPOSED ORDER
)
)
)
21
Plaintiff California Restaurant Association (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant City of Emeryville
22
(“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff may file a
23
Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction in excess
24
of the twenty-five (25) page limitation set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), but not to exceed forty
25
(40) pages in length. Plaintiff and Defendant hereby further stipulate and agree that Defendant
26
may file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary
27
Injunction in excess of the twenty-five (25) page limitation set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b),
28
but not to exceed thirty-five (35) pages in length. This Stipulation is made pursuant to Rules 7-11 and
{2176517.DOC;}
1
Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in
Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of
Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order
1
7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
2
There is good cause for the Stipulation to extend the page limit given that this case
3
involves several independent causes of action, each of which involves numerous complex and
4
novel legal issues. Each cause of action invokes constitutional challenges, including challenges
5
under the First (Free Speech), Fifth (Takings), and Fourteenth (Equal Protection) Amendments
6
and Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy) of the United States Constitution, along with similar claims
7
invoking the California Constitution. Thus, more than 25 pages are needed for the moving and
8
opposition papers to fully address each cause of action.
9
10
The parties also hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Defendant’s
responsive pleading to January 31 pursuant to Local Rule 6-1.
Finally, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to attempt to reserve March 9 as the hearing
12
date for Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and for Defendant’s anticipated Motion to Dismiss. The
13
parties also stipulate to the following briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and
14
for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss:
15
Opening Briefs:
January 31, 2017
16
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
11
Opposition Briefs:
February 14, 2017
17
Reply Briefs:
February 21, 2017
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
Dated: January 10, 2017
20
By:
21
22
/s/ Lukas J. Clary
Lukas J. Clary
Attorneys for Plaintiff
California Restaurant Association
23
24
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
law corporation
Dated: January 10, 2017
25
Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP
By:
26
/s/ J. Leah Castella
J. Leah Castella
Attorneys for Defendant
City of Emeryville
27
28
{2176517.DOC;}
2
Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in
Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of
Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order
1
2
3
4
5
PROPOSED ORDER
Plaintiff’s Motion for Extra Pages pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation is granted. Plaintiff
may file a memorandum of points and authorities up to 35 pages in support of its motion for
preliminary injunction. Defendant may file a memorandum of points and authorities up to 35
pages in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction.
6
7
Dated: __________________
January 10, 2017
____________________________________
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
law corporation
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin
11
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{2176517.DOC;}
3
Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in
Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of
Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?