California Restaurant Association v. City of Emeryville

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 12 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages filed by California Restaurant Association. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 10, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Charles L. Post, State Bar No. 160443 Lukas J. Clary, State Bar No. 251519 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin LAW CORPORATION 400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: 916/558-6000 Facsimile: 916/446-1611 Email: cpost@weintraub.com lclary@weintraub.com Attorneys for Plaintiff California Restaurant Association 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 law corporation weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 11 17 18 19 20 CALIFORNIA RESTAURANT ) Case No. 3:16-cv-06660-JST ASSOCIATION, a California nonprofit mutual ) benefit corporation, ) STIPULATION EXTENDING THE PAGE ) LIMITS FOR: (1) CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, ) RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION’S ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND ) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF CITY OF EMERYVILLE, a California ) MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY municipal corporation, ) INJUNCTION; AND (2) CITY OF ) EMERYVILLE’S OPPOSITION TO Defendant. ) CRA’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY ) INJUNCTION; PROPOSED ORDER ) ) ) 21 Plaintiff California Restaurant Association (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant City of Emeryville 22 (“Defendant”) (collectively “the Parties”) hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff may file a 23 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction in excess 24 of the twenty-five (25) page limitation set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), but not to exceed forty 25 (40) pages in length. Plaintiff and Defendant hereby further stipulate and agree that Defendant 26 may file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary 27 Injunction in excess of the twenty-five (25) page limitation set forth in Civil Local Rule 7-4(b), 28 but not to exceed thirty-five (35) pages in length. This Stipulation is made pursuant to Rules 7-11 and {2176517.DOC;} 1 Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order 1 7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 2 There is good cause for the Stipulation to extend the page limit given that this case 3 involves several independent causes of action, each of which involves numerous complex and 4 novel legal issues. Each cause of action invokes constitutional challenges, including challenges 5 under the First (Free Speech), Fifth (Takings), and Fourteenth (Equal Protection) Amendments 6 and Article VI, Clause 2 (Supremacy) of the United States Constitution, along with similar claims 7 invoking the California Constitution. Thus, more than 25 pages are needed for the moving and 8 opposition papers to fully address each cause of action. 9 10 The parties also hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Defendant’s responsive pleading to January 31 pursuant to Local Rule 6-1. Finally, the parties hereby stipulate and agree to attempt to reserve March 9 as the hearing 12 date for Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and for Defendant’s anticipated Motion to Dismiss. The 13 parties also stipulate to the following briefing schedule for Plaintiff’s Preliminary Injunction and 14 for Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss: 15 Opening Briefs: January 31, 2017 16 law corporation weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 11 Opposition Briefs: February 14, 2017 17 Reply Briefs: February 21, 2017 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 Dated: January 10, 2017 20 By: 21 22 /s/ Lukas J. Clary Lukas J. Clary Attorneys for Plaintiff California Restaurant Association 23 24 weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin law corporation Dated: January 10, 2017 25 Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP By: 26 /s/ J. Leah Castella J. Leah Castella Attorneys for Defendant City of Emeryville 27 28 {2176517.DOC;} 2 Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order 1 2 3 4 5 PROPOSED ORDER Plaintiff’s Motion for Extra Pages pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation is granted. Plaintiff may file a memorandum of points and authorities up to 35 pages in support of its motion for preliminary injunction. Defendant may file a memorandum of points and authorities up to 35 pages in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. 6 7 Dated: __________________ January 10, 2017 ____________________________________ Hon. Jon S. Tigar 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 law corporation weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin 11 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {2176517.DOC;} 3 Stipulation Extending Page Limit for 1) CRA’s MPA in Support of Preliminary Injunction; and 2) City of Emeryville’s Opposition; Proposed Order

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?