Hollins et al v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 25

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/29/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ROBIN HOLLINS and LOLA HOLLINS, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, v. ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA CORDIS CORPORATION and CONFLUENT MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants. / 16 17 No. C 16-06740 WHA A prior order required the parties to show cause why this action should not be remanded 18 for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction for the same reasons set forth in Judge Edward Chen’s 19 order and recently affirmed by our court of appeals in Dunson v. Cordis Corp., 854 F.3d 551 20 (9th Cir. 2017). The deadline to show cause has passed with no response from either side. 21 Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 29, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?