Hollins et al v. Cordis Corporation et al

Filing 25

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA. Signed by Judge Alsup on 6/29/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ROBIN HOLLINS and LOLA HOLLINS,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER REMANDING CASE
TO SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY
OF ALAMEDA

CORDIS CORPORATION and
CONFLUENT MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants.
/

16
17

No. C 16-06740 WHA

A prior order required the parties to show cause why this action should not be remanded

18

for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction for the same reasons set forth in Judge Edward Chen’s

19

order and recently affirmed by our court of appeals in Dunson v. Cordis Corp., 854 F.3d 551

20

(9th Cir. 2017). The deadline to show cause has passed with no response from either side.

21

Accordingly, this action is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 29, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE