Warne v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 100

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 97 Ex Parte Application for Prohibitory Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order and Mandatory Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2017)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

JOEL JENNINGS WARNE,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9
10

Case No.16-cv-06773-JSC

v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN INJUNCTION
AND NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR
PHONE CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 97 & 99

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s March 18, 2017 filing entitled “Ex Parte Application

13

for Prohibitory Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order and Mandatory Injunction” wherein

14

Plaintiff asks the Court to: (1) enjoin an administrative proceeding regarding a complaint he filed

15

with the City and County of San Francisco’s Office of Citizen Complaints, and (2) enjoin anyone

16

from the City and County of San Francisco from contacting Plaintiff, his family, and any

17

prospective witnesses. (Dkt. No. 97.) Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as it seeks relief beyond the

18

jurisdiction of the Court. The Court previously stayed discovery in this action until the pleadings

19

were settled. (Dkt. No. 44.) This stay applies to Plaintiff and Defendants equally.

20

The Court has also received Plaintiff’s Notice Showing Cause for his Non-Appearance at

21

the March 20, 2017 ADR Phone Conference. (Dkt. No. 99.) The Court will address ADR matters

22

at the Case Management Conference on May 11, 2017.

23
24
25
26

Plaintiff shall not file any further motions until the Court determines what claims may go
forward in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2017

27
28

JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge