Warne v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
100
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley denying 97 Ex Parte Application for Prohibitory Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order and Mandatory Injunction. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2017)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
JOEL JENNINGS WARNE,
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
10
Case No.16-cv-06773-JSC
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE
APPLICATION FOR AN INJUNCTION
AND NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR
PHONE CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 97 & 99
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s March 18, 2017 filing entitled “Ex Parte Application
13
for Prohibitory Injunction/Temporary Restraining Order and Mandatory Injunction” wherein
14
Plaintiff asks the Court to: (1) enjoin an administrative proceeding regarding a complaint he filed
15
with the City and County of San Francisco’s Office of Citizen Complaints, and (2) enjoin anyone
16
from the City and County of San Francisco from contacting Plaintiff, his family, and any
17
prospective witnesses. (Dkt. No. 97.) Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED as it seeks relief beyond the
18
jurisdiction of the Court. The Court previously stayed discovery in this action until the pleadings
19
were settled. (Dkt. No. 44.) This stay applies to Plaintiff and Defendants equally.
20
The Court has also received Plaintiff’s Notice Showing Cause for his Non-Appearance at
21
the March 20, 2017 ADR Phone Conference. (Dkt. No. 99.) The Court will address ADR matters
22
at the Case Management Conference on May 11, 2017.
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff shall not file any further motions until the Court determines what claims may go
forward in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 24, 2017
27
28
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?