Nevro Corp v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
Filing
387
ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James granting 352 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 361 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting 334 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (mejlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
NEVRO CORP,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
Case No. 16-cv-06830-VC (MEJ)
ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. Nos. 334, 352, 361
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, et
al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
The parties filed three Motions to Seal documents filed in connection with Plaintiff Nevro
14
Corp.’s Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Reconsideration. Dkt. Nos. 334, 352, 361. The
15
parties argue the Motions contain information Defendants Boston Scientific Corporation and
16
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation (together, “BSC”) designated as confidential.
17
BSC filed declarations in support thereof. Dkt. Nos. 336, 338, 352-1, 364-65. Having reviewed
18
the parties’ submissions, the Court finds good cause exists to seal this material. See Center for
19
Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. FCA
20
U.S. LLC v. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 137 S. Ct. 38 (2016) (applying the “less exacting ‘good cause’
21
standard” for sealed materials attached to a discovery motion). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS
22
the Motions to Seal.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: May 17, 2018
______________________________________
MARIA-ELENA JAMES
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?