Panaligan v. Claire's Boutiques, Inc. et al

Filing 32

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this cause, and the settlement having been placed on the record, it is ordered that plaintiff's claims alleged against defendants herein be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 26, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2017)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

BEVERLY PANALIGAN,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 16-cv-06838-MMC
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
CLAIRE'S BOUTIQUES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

12
13
14

The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this
cause, and the settlement having been placed on the record,

15

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's claims alleged against defendants herein

16

be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to

17

this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing

18

counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over,

19

the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the

20

calendar for further proceedings as appropriate.

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: July 26, 2017
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge