Yurok Tribe et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

Filing 61

ORDER granting 60 STIPULATION re To Extend Case Management Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 5/2/2017. Case Management Conference continued to 5/2/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/03/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JEFFREY H. WOOD, Acting Assistant Attorney General Environment & Natural Resources Division SETH M. BARSKY, Chief S. JAY GOVINDAN, Assistant Chief ROBERT P. WILLIAMS, Sr. Trial Attorney KAITLYN POIRIER, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division Wildlife & Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: 202-307-6623; Fax: 202-305-0275 Email: robert.p.williams@usdoj.gov Email: kaitlyn.poirier@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 YUROK TRIBE, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, et al., ) ) Defendants, ) and ) ) KLAMATH WATER USERS ) ASSOCIATION, et al., ) ) Defendant-Intervenors. ) Case No. 3:16-cv-06863-WHO STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES 25 26 27 28 1 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs, Federal Defendants, and Defendant- 1 2 Intervenors hereby jointly request by stipulation that the deadlines established in the Order 3 Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines, ECF No. 5, be extended. The 4 5 parties stipulate to the following extended deadlines:  6 7 April 7, 2017 – Last day to: meet and confer re: initial disclosures1, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan; file ADR Certification signed by Parties and 8 Counsel; and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone 9 Conference. 10  11 April 21, 2017 – Last day to: file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state 12 objection in Rule 26(f) Report, and file Case Management Statement per Standing Order 13 re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement 14  15 16 17 18 19 20 May 2, 2017 – If necessary, Initial Case Management Conference There is good cause to establish the above schedule, given that such deadlines are currently stayed in the related case, Hoopa Valley Tribe v. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, 3:16-cv04294-WHO, and because the parties may need additional time to decide how to proceed with this case following the Court’s resolution of Federal Defendants’ Motion to Strike and Limit the 21 Scope of Review to the Administrative Record; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary 22 Judgment; and Federal Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in the Hoopa Valley Tribe case. The 23 24 25 parties have separately stipulated to an extension of time for Federal Defendants and DefendantIntervenors to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint (the parties have stipulated 26 27 28 Federal Defendants’ reserve their rights to dispute whether this case is subject to initial disclosures and all other discovery related deadlines on the grounds that this is an action for review on an administrative record. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A); (a)(1)(B)(i); (f)(1). 1 2 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines 1 to a deadline of April 3, 2017, ECF No. 59). Other than Federal Defendants’ Administrative 2 Motion Requesting an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary 3 Judgment, ECF No. 19, there have been no other requests for extension of time by any party, and 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 the parties do not believe that granting this stipulation will adversely affect any existing deadlines in the case. For the foregoing reasons, the parties respectfully request entry of this agreed-upon stipulation. Dated: February 1, 2017 Respectfully submitted, JEFFREY H. WOOD, Acting Assistant Attorney General SETH M. BARSKY, Chief S. JAY GOVINDAN, Assistant Chief ROBERT P. WILLIAMS, Sr. Trial Attorney 15 21 /s/ Kaitlyn Poirier KAITLYN POIRIER, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 (202) 307-6623 (tel) (202) 305-0275 (fax) kaitlyn.poirier@usdoj.gov 22 Attorneys for Federal Defendants 16 17 18 19 20 23 24 25 26 27 28 /s/ Patti A. Goldman KRISTEN L. BOYLES (CSBA # 158450) PATTI A. GOLDMAN (WSBA # 24426) [Admitted Pro Hac Vice] Earthjustice 705 Second Avenue, Suite 203 Seattle, WA 98104-1711 3 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ph: (206) 343-7340 | Fax: (206) 343-1526 kboyles@earthjustice.org pgoldman@earthjustice.org stsosie@earthjustice.org TRENT ORR (CSBA # 77656) Earthjustice 50 California, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Ph: (415) 217-2082 | Fax: (415) 217-2040 torr@earthjustice.org Attorneys for Plaintiffs for Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, and Klamath Riverkeeper 14 CHEYENNE SANDERS (CSBA # 307359) Yurok Tribe 190 Klamath Blvd. PO BOX 1027 Klamath, CA 95548 Ph: (707) 482-1350 | Fax: (707) 482-1377 csanders@yuroktribe.nsn.us 15 Attorney for Plaintiff Yurok Tribe 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 SOMACH SIMMONS & DUNN, PC /s/ Paul S. Simmons Paul S. Simmons Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors Klamath Water Users Association, Sunnyside Irrigation District, and Ben DuVal CLYDE SNOW & SESSIONS, P.C. /s/ Reagan L. B. Desmond Reagan L. B. Desmond 25 Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor Klamath Drainage District 26 WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC 27 28 /s/ John P. Kinsey 4 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines John P. Kinsey 1 2 Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenors Klamath Irrigation District and Pine Grove Irrigation District 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5-1(i)(3) I, Kaitlyn Poirier, attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated with a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 11 foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. 12 Dated: February 1, 2017 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Kaitlyn Poirier KAITLYN POIRIER, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 (202) 307-6623 (tel) (202) 305-0275 (fax) kaitlyn.poirier@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above was electronically filed with the 3 Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. Copies of this document will be served upon interested counsel via 4 the Notices of Electronic Filing that are generated by CM/ECF. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Dated: February 1, 2017 /s/ Kaitlyn Poirier KAITLYN POIRIER, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Environment and Natural Resources Division Wildlife and Marine Resources Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 (202) 307-6623 (tel) (202) 305-0275 (fax) kaitlyn.poirier@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines 1 2 ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 3rd February Dated this __________day of ____________, 2017. 5 6 7 _____________________________________________________ HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 3:16-cv-06863-WHO Joint Motion to Extend Case Management Deadlines

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?