Yurok Tribe et al v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

Filing 70

ORDER MODIFYING 62 FEBRUARY 8, 2017 INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/24/2017. The Parties shall meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes that may arise relating to the Bureaus implementation of the surface flushing flows, deep flushing flows, and emergency dilution flows ordered herein, and/or the adaptive management process in paragraph 16, prior to seeking further intervention from this Court. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2017)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

YUROK TRIBE, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, et al., )
)
Defendants,
)
)
and
)
)
KLAMATH WATER USERS
)
ASSOCIATION, et al.,
)
)
Defendant-Intervenors.
)

Case No. 3:16-cv-06863-WHO
ORDER
MODIFYING FEBRUARY 8, 2017
INJUNCTION

15
For the reasons stated in the Court’s February 8, 2017 Order (Dckt. No. 62), the Court

16
17

hereby enters the following injunction,1 modifying page 53, lines 5-22, of that Order:
1.

18

Until such time as the formal consultation, recently initiated by the federal

19

defendants, is completed, the Bureau is ordered to require two types of flows: (1) winter-

20

spring flushing flows modeled on Management Guidance 1 and 2 designed to dislodge and

21

flush out polychaete worms that host Ceratanova shasta (C. shasta) and (2) emergency

22

dilution flows modeled on Management Guidance 4, in Measures to Reduce Ceratanova

23

Shasta Infection of Klamath River Salmonids: A Guidance Document (Jan. 17, 2017)

24

(“Guidance Document”) (Dckt. No. 54-3).

The parameters of these required flows are

27

This Order does not prescribe the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s (“Bureau”) proposed action
or the National Marine Fisheries Service’s (“NMFS”) jeopardy determination or incidental
take statement for the reinitiated Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) consultation for the
operation of the Klamath Project.

28

1

25
26

1

3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1

described below. Subject to the timeframes described in Management Guidance ##1, 2, and

2

4, the timing of the releases of water is left to the Bureau’s discretion.

3

2.

In all other respects, the 2013 Biological Opinion on Klamath Project

4

Operations (“2013 BiOp”) and incidental take statement remain in effect pending completion

5

of the reinitiated formal consultation.

6

3.

In no event shall the mitigation measures interfere with conditions necessary to

7

protect the endangered sucker fish.

8

I.

Winter-Spring Surface Flushing Flows and Deep Flushing Flows

9

a.

2017

10

4.

As of the date of this injunction, the Parties2 have agreed that surface flushing

11

flows consistent with Management Guidance #1 and that the spirit and intent, although not the

12

specific desired magnitude, of deep flushing flows modeled on Management Guidance #2

13

were met twice during February 2017 flow events.

14

5.

If sufficient hydrologic conditions exist, and increased downstream flows

15

would not interfere with the conditions necessary to protect endangered Lost River and

16

shortnose suckers or negatively impact water available for the implementation of emergency

17

dilution flows, the Bureau shall make another attempt to implement a deep flushing flow

18

modeled on Management Guidance #2 within the inherent infrastructure limitations and

19

public safety constraints (e.g., Link River Dam release capacity, flooding concerns, etc.).

20
21
22
For purposes of this Order, the term “Parties” refers to the parties in both this case and the
companion case, No. 16-4294-WHO, and specifically includes: Plaintiffs Yurok Tribe,
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, Institute for Fisheries Resources, and
Klamath Riverkeeper in this case and Plaintiff Hoopa Valley Tribe in the companion case;
Federal Defendants U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and National Marine Fisheries Service; and
Defendant-Intervenors Klamath Water Users Association, Sunnyside Irrigation District, Ben
DuVal, Klamath Drainage District, Klamath Irrigation District, and Pine Grove Irrigation
District.
2

23
24
25
26
27
28

2
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1

b.

Subsequent Years

2

6.

Until the reinitiated formal consultation is complete, the Bureau shall release

3

surface flushing flows modeled on Management Guidance #1 in every year.

4

7.

Until the reinitiated formal consultation is complete, the Bureau shall release

5

deep flushing flows modeled on Management Guidance #2 in at least every other year

6

(beginning in 2017) unless the Bureau determines that such flows are limited and/or precluded

7

by inherent hydrologic, infrastructure, and/or public safety constraints.

8

8.

Subject to the timeframes described in Management Guidance #1 and

9

Management Guidance #2, the timing of any such releases of water is left to the Bureau’s

10

discretion; however, the Bureau shall coordinate with the Parties regarding the timing and

11

magnitude of these flows. Notwithstanding the Bureau’s coordination with the Parties, the

12

Bureau shall retain ultimate decision making authority as the action agency, subject to the

13

requirements of paragraphs 6 and 7 of this Order.

14

9.

When surface and deep flushing flow releases occur after March 1, the Bureau

15

shall account for such volume of water that is above and beyond what would have otherwise

16

been released under the 2013 BiOp formulaic distribution in a manner that is not attributed

17

towards the Environmental Water Account (“EWA”). When surface and deep flushing flow

18

releases occur prior to March 1, the Bureau shall account for such volume of water that is

19

above and beyond releases that would have occurred under the 2013 BiOp in a manner that

20

does not affect the calculations determining the volume of the EWA on March 1.

21

II.

22
23

Emergency Dilution Flows
10.

Until such time that reinitiated formal consultation is complete, the Bureau

shall release emergency dilution flows modeled on Management Guidance #4 as follows:

24
25
26
27
28

3
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1
2

a.
11.

Establishment of Reserve Water Supply

The Bureau shall set water operations and water supply allocations for Upper

3

Klamath Lake, the EWA, and the Project Supply as defined in the 2013 BiOp, consistent with

4

the Proposed Action outlined in the 2013 BiOp, except as may be affected by this Order.

5

12.

Each year this plan is in effect, the Bureau shall establish a 50,000 acre foot

6

(“50 TAF”) Reserve Water (“Reserve Water”) supply to implement the emergency dilution

7

flows modeled on Management Guidance #4 as described in paragraph 14 herein. Reserve

8

Water shall be available from April 1 through the earlier of the two cessation dates identified

9

in paragraph 14.d. and shall be utilized if the disease threshold criteria described in paragraph

10
11

14.c. are met or exceeded.
13.

The Bureau shall manage the Klamath Reclamation Project (“Project”),

12

including Project deliveries from upper Klamath Lake (“UKL”), in a manner that will not

13

preclude the ability to provide Reserve Water to implement up to 50 TAF of emergency

14

dilution flows and/or interfere with its ability to meet its obligations under the ESA with

15

regard to endangered suckers and/or their critical habitat.

16
17

b.
14.

Implementation of Emergency Dilution Flows

Reserve Water for emergency dilution flows shall be released downstream of

18

Iron Gate Dam (“IGD”) following Management Guidance #4 when either of the disease

19

threshold criteria described in paragraph 14.c. below is met.

20

a.

Water releases to achieve 3,000 cfs at IGD shall be implemented

21

immediately if the disease thresholds are met and flows at IGD are

22

below 3,000 cfs. If flows at IGD already exceed 3,000 cfs, and have

23

been at or above 3,000 cfs for at least seven days, flows to achieve

24

4,000 cfs at IGD shall be implemented. Flows at IGD shall be

25

maintained or increased from 3,000 cfs to 4,000 cfs if disease levels

26

remain above disease threshold criteria. If disease levels become

27
28

4
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1

reduced below the paragraph 14.c. thresholds, flows at IGD shall be

2

reduced slowly while disease rates are monitored. Release of Reserve

3

Water shall not count against the EWA and Reserve Water volume

4

shall be capped at 50 TAF. If the 50 TAF of Reserve Water is expended

5

before the 80% outmigration date as described in paragraph 14.d.

6

below, the Bureau shall confer with the Parties

7

feasibility and desirability of utilizing other water sources to prolong

8

emergency dilution flows.

9

b.

to evaluate the

The volume of Reserve Water released shall be accounted for as the

10

difference between the emergency dilution flow (i.e., 3,000 cfs or 4,000

11

cfs) and the calculated IGD flow release based upon the formulaic

12

approach for EWA distribution.

13

c.

Emergency dilution releases using up to 50 TAF of Reserve Water shall

14

be implemented when the following disease threshold criteria are met

15

or exceeded:

16

1.

17

per liter for the preceding sample based on quantitative polymerase

18

chain reaction (qPCR) from water filtration samples at any sampling

19

station;

20

or (whichever occurs first)

21

2.

22

salmon (both wild and hatchery) exceeds 20% in aggregate for the

23

preceding week at the Kinsman Rotary Screw Trap.

24

d.

Spore concentrations exceed 5 spores (non-specified genotype)

The prevalence of infection of all captured juvenile Chinook

Emergency dilution flows shall not be implemented or shall cease if an

25

estimated 80 percent of the wild juvenile Chinook salmon have

26

outmigrated past the Kinsman Rotary Screw Trap, or after June 15,

27
28

5
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1

whichever occurs first. The predictive model currently under

2

development by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service’s (“USFWS”) Arcata

3

Field Office shall be used in making the 80% outmigration estimation

4

determination. The Parties understand that the predictive model will

5

identify a week at which 80 percent of the wild run has outmigrated.

6

To account for model uncertainty and ensure a reasonable level of

7

confidence that 80 percent of the wild run has outmigrated, the Bureau

8

shall deem the date that is seven (7) additional calendar days after the

9

last calendar day of the identified week to be the date that 80% of the

10

wild run has outmigrated.

11

accurate model prediction on a daily timestep, to account for

12

uncertainty the Bureau shall deem the date that is seven (7) additional

13

calendar days after the point identified by USFWS to be the date that

14

80% of the wild run has outmigrated. In the absence of a sufficient

15

predictive model as determined by USFWS’s Arcata Field Office, the

16

Bureau shall deem the date that is seven (7) additional calendar days

17

after the last calendar day of the estimated week provided by that

18

Office to be the date that 80 percent of the wild run has outmigrated.

If future refinements allow for a more

19

15.

20

consistent with the approach for EWA distribution described in the 2013 BiOp except as set

21

out in this Order. Deviations from the formulaic approach regarding the use of EWA to

22

improve conditions for coho salmon may occur subject to the procedures in (a) through (f)

23

below and consistent with the 2013 BiOp except for (e)-(f) below:

24
25

Klamath River flows at IGD and distribution of the EWA shall be implemented

a. The FASTA (“Flow Account Scheduling Technical Advisory”) Team may
recommend deviations to the Bureau, NMFS, and USFWS.

26
27
28

6
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1

b. The Bureau and NMFS may also make recommendations to deviate from the

2

formulaic approach consistent with the purpose of improving conditions for coho salmon

3

including to address urgent ecological concerns such as mitigating fish disease.

4

c. In the event that the Bureau and/or NMFS recommend deviations, the Agencies

5

shall coordinate with FASTA prior to implementation with the goal of gaining consensus on

6

the flow recommendation.

7

d. Deviations shall not be implemented unless both NMFS and USFWS have

8

determined that the resulting deviations will not result in adverse effects to ESA-listed species

9

that would otherwise not occur without deviating from the formulaic approach.

10

e. In the event that one or more of the disease threshold criteria identified in paragraph

11

14.c. is met while flow augmentation is occurring through deviation from the formulaic

12

approach for the use of EWA under the FASTA process or as a result of an agency

13

recommendation, IGD releases shall be adjusted to be consistent with Management Guidance

14

#4. The volume of Reserve Water used to implement those flows shall be accounted for as the

15

difference between the resulting flow and the calculated IGD flow release based upon the

16

formulaic approach for EWA distribution (i.e., not the discharge resulting from the deviation

17

from the formulaic approach).

18

f. If disease threshold criteria have been met and flows have been increased consistent

19

with Management Guidance #4, the FASTA Team, or Agencies may recommend increased

20

flows above those contained within Management Guidance #4 (3,000 cfs or 4,000 cfs at IGD)

21

through the use of EWA.

22

III.

Adaptive Management

23

16.

Until reinitiated formal consultation is complete, the flushing flows and the emergency

24

dilution flows shall be provided according to the terms in this Order, subject to adaptive

25

management as set forth herein.

26

collaboratively identify and discuss reliable, newly-identified information that may relate to

The technical representatives of the parties shall

27
28

7
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction

1

provisions of this Order and achieving the fish disease management purposes of this Order. If

2

the Parties reach consensus that an amended flow plan is warranted before reinitiated formal

3

consultation is completed, they may jointly submit such plan to the Court for approval.

4

IV.

Conclusion

5

17.

The Parties shall meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve any disputes that

6

may arise relating to the Bureau’s implementation of the surface flushing flows, deep flushing

7

flows, and emergency dilution flows ordered herein, and/or the adaptive management process

8

in paragraph 16, prior to seeking further intervention from this Court.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated March 24, 2017.

12
13
14
15

HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

8
3:16-cv-06863-WHO
Order Modifying February 8, 2017 Injunction