Scott et al v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #53 of Dismissal of Entire Action filed by Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/26/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Daryl S. Landy, Bar No. 136288
Sarah J. Allen, Bar No. 306286
daryl.landy@morganlewis.com
sarah.allen@morganlewis.com
600 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1800
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Tel: +1.949.399.7000
Fax: +1.949.399.7001
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
Jennifer Svanfeldt, Bar No. 233248
jennifer.svanfeldt@morganlewis.com
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
Tel: +1.415.442.1000
Fax: +1.4125.442.1001
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC
SETAREH LAW GROUP
Shaun Setareh, Bar No. 204514
Thomas Segal, Bar No. 222791
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Tel: 310.888.7771
Fax: 310.888.0109
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ANDRE SCOTT, KEN FASSLER and
ELIJAH MAXWELL-WILSON
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ANDRE SCOTT, an individual; KEN
FASSLER, an individual; ELIJAH
MAXWELL-WILSON, an individual, and on
behalf of themselves, all other similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Case No. 3:16-cv-06869-EMC
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ENTIRE ACTION
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES 1-50, Inclusive,
Defendants.
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
STIP. OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06869-EMC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
COSTA MESA
DB2/ 32048070.3
1
Plaintiffs Andre Scott, Ken Fassler and Elijah Maxwell-Wilson (“Plaintiffs”) and
2
Defendant Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC (“Defendant”), by and through
3
their counsel of record hereby stipulate as follows:
4
5
6
1.
All of Plaintiffs’ individual claims in the above-entitled action are dismissed with
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
2.
Plaintiffs’ claims alleged on behalf of the putative class are dismissed without
7
prejudice to the other putative class members pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
8
41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
9
3.
10
Plaintiffs will not re-assert or re-file any class, collective, or representative action
claims that were, or could have been, alleged in this action; and
11
4.
12
IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
13
Each party is to bear their own fees and costs.
Dated: January 12, 2018
SETAREH LAW GROUP
14
15
By /s/ Thomas Segal
Shaun Setareh
Thomas Segal
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ANDRE SCOTT, KEN FASSLER and ELIJAH
MAXWELL-WILSON
16
17
18
19
Dated: January 12, 2018
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
20
By /s/ Daryl S. Landy
Daryl S. Landy
Attorneys for Defendant
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS
MANAGEMENT, LLC
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
COSTA MESA
DB2/ 32048070.3
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06869-EMC
1
2
ATTESTATION RE ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES
I, DARYL S. LANDY, attest pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that all
3
other signatories to this document, on whose behalf this filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s
4
content and have authorized this filing. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the
5
United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
6
Dated: January 12, 2018
/s/ Daryl S. Landy
Daryl S. Landy
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
COSTA MESA
DB2/ 32048070.3
[PROPOSED] STIP. PROTECTIVE ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06869-EMC
1
7
8
9
10
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
2.
Plaintiffs’ class action claims are dismissed without prejudice to other putative
class members pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii);
3.
Plaintiffs will not re-assert or re-file any class, collective, or representative action
claims that were, or could have been, alleged in this action; and
4.
Each party will bear their own fees and costs.
UNIT
ED
12
13
1/26/18
Dated: ___________________
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
_____________________________________
Hon. Edward M. Chen
n
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGEard M. Che
Edw
Judge
NO
14
RT
U
O
11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
6
All of Plaintiffs’ individual claims in the above-entitled action are dismissed with
RT
15
ER
H
16
17
FO
5
1.
LI
4
been shown, the Court hereby orders that:
A
3
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action, and good cause having
S
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
COSTA MESA
DB2/ 32048070.3
JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-06869-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?