Chavez v. FCA US LLC et al

Filing 56

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR. STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Jose Chavez filed by Jose Chavez. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/15/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 5 Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Jessica M. Thompson (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 Email: steve@hbsslaw.com Email: jessicat@hbsslaw.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 [Additional counsel on signature page] 2 3 4 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE CHAVEZ, et al., No. 3:16-cv-06909-EMC 11 Plaintiffs, 12 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. 13 FCA US LLC, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 On February 10, 2017, the parties filed a Stipulation and Proposed Order to stay this action 17 pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on whether to centralize this 18 action with a number of other similar actions in a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”; the “MDL 19 Motion”); and 20 Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 21 following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate 22 in the following ADR process:1 23 Private ADR: Private mediation by a mediator to be agreed upon by the parties. 24 Other requested deadline: The parties agree to hold the ADR session by a date to be 25 determined after a decision has been rendered on the MDL Motion and after the operative complaint 26 has been tested on motion(s) to dismiss. 27 28 1 By entering into this stipulation, Defendants do not waive, and expressly preserve, all defenses, including all defenses concerning jurisdiction, service or otherwise. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 1 010635-11 937184 V1 Case No.: 3:16-cv-06909-EMC 1 Dated: February 14, 2017 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 6 /s/ Steve W. Berman Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Jessica M. Thompson (Pro Hac Vice) 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 Email: steve@hbsslaw.com Email: jessicat@hbsslaw.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 3 4 5 8 Dated: February 14, 2017 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 14 /s/ Robert J. Giuffra, Jr. Robert J. Giuffra, Jr. (Pro Hac Vice) William B. Monahan (Pro Hac Vice) Darrell S. Cafasso (Pro Hac Vice) 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 Telephone:(212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 Email: giuffrar@sullcrom.com Email: monahanw@sullcrom.com Email: cafassod@sullcrom.com 15 Attorneys for Defendant FCA US LLC 9 10 11 12 13 16 Dated: February 14, 2017 CLEARY GOTTLIEB STEEN & HAMILTON LLP 20 /s/ Matthew D. Slater Matthew D. Slater (Pro Hac Vice) 2000 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 974-1500 Facsimile: (292) 974-1999 Email: mslater@cgsh.com 21 Attorney for Defendant Robert Bosch LLC 17 18 19 22 Attestation Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3): 23 24 I, Steve W. Berman, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing document. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories have concurred in this filing. 25 Dated: February 14, 2017 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP /s/ Steve W. Berman Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) 26 27 Attorney for Plaintiffs 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 2 010635-11 937184 V1 Case No.: 3:16-cv-06909-EMC PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 S RT 7 9 R NIA dwa Judge E ER H 8 hen rd M. C NO 6 FO 5 ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN ERED O ORD Judge United States District IT IS S LI 2/15/17 UNIT ED Dated: 4 RT U O 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - 3 010635-11 937184 V1 Case No.: 3:16-cv-06909-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?