Husting et al v. Maplebear, Inc., dba Instacart
Filing
26
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/16/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTI-IERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JONATHAN HUSTING, eta!. ,
CASE No C 3:16-cv-06921 -EMC
Plaintiff(s)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
V.
MAPLEBEAR, INC., dba Instacart
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5 . The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
ll Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeed for
ADR Phone Conf rence. Do not use this
e
form. S ee Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.
CJ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
II Private ADR (specify process and orovider)
JAMS or another mutoally agreeab'fe provider.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
~
the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,
unless otherwise ordered.)
B other requested deadline:
Date: 2f9f2017
sf Julie C. Erickson
Date:2f9f2017
Attorn~y for Plaintiff
sf Ben Berkowitz
Attorney for Defendant
R NIA
S
UNIT
ED
RT
FO
. Chen
dward M
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Judge E
LI
2/16/2017
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
Date:
RT
U
O
0 IT IS SO ORDERED
0 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-201 7
A
H
ER
Important! £-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed
C
N
F
Order Selecting Mediation" or "S tipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed
D IS T IC T O
R
Order Selecting Private ADR. "
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?