Husting et al v. Maplebear, Inc., dba Instacart

Filing 26

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/16/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTI-IERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JONATHAN HUSTING, eta!. , CASE No C 3:16-cv-06921 -EMC Plaintiff(s) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC., dba Instacart Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5 . The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: ll Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice ofNeed for ADR Phone Conf rence. Do not use this e form. S ee Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. CJ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) II Private ADR (specify process and orovider) JAMS or another mutoally agreeab'fe provider. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ~ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) B other requested deadline: Date: 2f9f2017 sf Julie C. Erickson Date:2f9f2017 Attorn~y for Plaintiff sf Ben Berkowitz Attorney for Defendant R NIA S UNIT ED RT FO . Chen dward M U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Judge E LI 2/16/2017 DERED O OR IT IS S NO Date: RT U O 0 IT IS SO ORDERED 0 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: S DISTRICT TE C TA Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-201 7 A H ER Important! £-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed C N F Order Selecting Mediation" or "S tipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed D IS T IC T O R Order Selecting Private ADR. "

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?