Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. DeSilva Gates Construction, L.P.

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. Case Management Statement due by 3/30/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/6/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/23/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-06948 EMC TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ) CONNECTICUT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DESILVA GATES CONSTRUCTION, L.P., ) ) Defendant. ) ) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Date: March 9, 2017 Time: 9:30 a.m. Dept.: Courtroom 5 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: 18 GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, it is hereby ordered that: 19 (1) 20 The Case Management Conference, currently set for March 9, 2017, is continued to April 6, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 5 of the above-entitled Court. (2) 21 All deadlines for the parties to further meet and confer under Federal Rules of Civil 22 Procedure Rule 26(f), comply with their initial disclosure requirements, and file a Case 23 Management Conference Statement shall be scheduled and calculated based on the new date for the 24 Case Management Conference. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-06948 (3) 1 (2) weeks in advance of the new Case Management Conference date. IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 2/23/17 UNIT ED S Date: RT U O 6 ERED O ORD ________________________________ IT IS S By: 7 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RT dwa Judge E ER H 10 11 hen rd M. C NO 9 FO 8 LI 5 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 3 A 2 Defendant is ordered to file a response to the operative Complaint no later than two N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-06948

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?