Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. DeSilva Gates Construction, L.P.
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut. Case Management Statement due by 3/30/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/6/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/23/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-06948 EMC
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF )
CONNECTICUT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DESILVA GATES CONSTRUCTION, L.P., )
)
Defendant.
)
)
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Date: March 9, 2017
Time: 9:30 a.m.
Dept.: Courtroom 5
TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:
18
GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, it is hereby ordered that:
19
(1)
20
The Case Management Conference, currently set for March 9, 2017, is continued to
April 6, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 5 of the above-entitled Court.
(2)
21
All deadlines for the parties to further meet and confer under Federal Rules of Civil
22
Procedure Rule 26(f), comply with their initial disclosure requirements, and file a Case
23
Management Conference Statement shall be scheduled and calculated based on the new date for the
24
Case Management Conference.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-06948
(3)
1
(2) weeks in advance of the new Case Management Conference date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
2/23/17
UNIT
ED
S
Date:
RT
U
O
6
ERED
O ORD
________________________________
IT IS S
By:
7
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
RT
dwa
Judge E
ER
H
10
11
hen
rd M. C
NO
9
FO
8
LI
5
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
R NIA
3
A
2
Defendant is ordered to file a response to the operative Complaint no later than two
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-06948
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?