Asetek Danmark A/S v. Newegg Inc. et al

Filing 47

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 46 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Amend Case Schedule; Proposed Order filed by Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 16, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Robert F. McCaulyey (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Erik P. Puknys (SBN 190926)
[e-mail]
Jacob Schroeder (SBN 264717)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

8
9
10
11
12

Arpita Bhattacharyya (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Two Seaport Lane, 6th Floor
Boston, MA 02210-2001
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Kent E. Baldauf, Jr. (PA ID No. 70793)*
Bryan P. Clark (PA ID No. 205708)*
Christian D. Ehret (PA ID No. 311984)*
THE WEBB LAW FIRM
One Gateway Center
420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Suite 1200
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
*Pro Hac Vice Applications Forthcoming*
Counsel for Defendants
Newegg, Inc. and Newegg North America, Inc.

13
14

Gordon M. Fauth, Jr. (SBN 190280)
LITIGATION LAW GROUP
1801 Clement Avenue, Suite 101
Alameda, CA 94501
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]

Attorneys for PLaintiff
ASETEK DANMARK A/S

15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
ASETEK DANMARK A/S

CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07068-JST

21
Plaintiff,
22
v.

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND
CASE SCHEDULE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

23
24
25

NEWEGG INC., NEWEGG NORTH
AMERICA INC.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND C ASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:16-cv-07068-JST

1

Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendants Newegg Inc. and Newegg North

2

America Inc. (“Newegg”) jointly stipulate, with the Court’s permission, to amend the Case Schedule

3

(Dkt. 38), as provided in the table below. This stipulation (if granted) will not affect the Court’s

4

previously scheduled claim construction hearing date, but only intervening dates that should not

5

affect the Court.

6

The patents-in-suit (U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764) are the same as the patents-

7

in-suit in Asia Vital Components Co. Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/S, Case No. 3:16-cv-07160-JST (“the

8

AVC Case”). The claim construction hearing for both the AVC Case and this case are set for the

9

same date and time, November 7, 2017 at 1:30 p.m.

10

Counsel for the parties to this action continue to engage in informal settlement discussions,

11

and a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Kim is calendared for July 11, 2017. In view of

12

these ongoing settlement discussions, and mindful of the Court’s recent order in the AVC Case

13

granting AVC a one-month extension until June 30, 2017 to serve invalidity contentions (and

14

making additional scheduling modifications that do not affect the claim construction hearing date),

15

the parties stipulate and respectfully request that the Court similarly amend the schedule in this case

16

as provided in the table below:

17

Current Schedule

Proposed Schedule

Invalidity Contentions

May 30, 2017

June 30, 2017

Exchange of Proposed Terms for Construction

June 13, 2017

August 4, 2017

Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and
Extrinsic Evidence

August 4, 2017

August 18, 2017

Deadline to file Joint Claim Construction and
Prehearing Statement

August 15, 2017

August 25, 2017

24

Damages Contentions

August 8, 2017

September 1, 2017

25

Claim Construction Discovery Cutoff

September 14, 2017

Same (No Change)

26

Deadline to file Opening Claim Construction Brief

September 22, 2017

Same (No Change)

27

Responsive Damages Contentions

September 7, 2017

September 29, 2017

28

Deadline to file Responsive Claim Construction

October 6, 2017

Same (No Change)

18
19

Event

20
21
22
23

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND C ASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:16-cv-07068-JST

1
2

Brief
October 13, 2017

Same (No Change)

Claim Construction Hearing

3

Deadline to file Reply in Support of Opening Claim
Construction Brief (Local Rule - 7 days after
Responsive Brief)

November 7, 2017
at 1:30 PM

Same (No Change)

4
5
6
Respectfully submitted,

7
8

Dated: June 14, 2017

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

9
By:

10

/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley

11
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Asetek Danmark A/S

12
13
Dated: June 14, 2017

LITIGATION LAW GROUP

14
By:

15

/s/ Gordon M. Fauth, Jr.
Gordon M. Fauth Jr.

16
Attorneys for Defendants
Newegg Inc. and Newegg North America, Inc.

17
18

ATTESTATION

19
20
21

I, Robert F. McCauley, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been
obtained from counsel for Newegg Inc. and Newegg North America, Inc.

22
23

Dated: June 14, 2017

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

24
25

By:

/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley

26
27

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Asetek Danmark A/S

28
3

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND C ASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:16-cv-07068-JS

1
2
3
4

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court adopts
the parties’ proposed revised schedule as set forth in the Stipulation above.
IT IS SO ORDERED

5
6
7
8

June 16, 2017
Dated: _______________________

_____________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND C ASE SCHEDULE
Case No. 3:16-cv-07068-JST