Asetek Danmark A/S v. Newegg Inc. et al

Filing 51

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulated Request and Proposed Order to Stay Proceedings Pending Consummation of Settlement filed by Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 21, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) robert.mccauley@finnegan.com Erik P. Puknys (SBN 190926) erik.puknys@finnegan.com Jacob Schroeder (SBN 264717) jacob.schroeder@finnegan.com Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665) jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Attorneys for Plaintiff ASETEK DANMARK A/S 11 12 Gordon M. Fauth, Jr. (SBN 190280) LITIGATION LAW GROUP 1801 Clement Avenue, Suite 101 Alameda, CA 94501 Telephone: (510) 238-9610 Facsimile: (510) 337-1431 gmf@classlitigation.com Kent E. Baldauf, Jr. (PA ID No. 70793)* Bryan P. Clark (PA ID No. 205708)* Christian D. Ehret (PA ID No. 311984)* THE WEBB LAW FIRM Once Gateway Center 420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Suite 1200 Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Telephone: (412) 471-8815 Facsimile: (412) 471-4094 kbaldaufjr@webblaw.com bclark@webblaw.com cehret@webblaw.com *Pro Hac Vice Applications Forthcoming* 13 Attorneys for Defendants Newegg, Inc. and Newegg North America, Inc. 14 15 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 20 21 ASETEK DANMARK A/S 22 23 24 Plaintiff, v. NEWEGG INC., NEWEGG NORTH AMERICA INC., CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07068-JST JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING CONSUMMATION OF SETTLEMENT 25 Defendants. 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-CV-7068-JST 1 Plaintiff Asetek Danmark A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendants Newegg Inc. and Newegg North 2 America Inc. (“Newegg”), through their undersigned attorneys, hereby jointly notify the Court that 3 the parties have reached an agreement to settle this matter (including written terms agreed upon 4 between outside counsel), and respectfully request an order from the Court to stay proceedings for 5 14 days so that the parties can finalize client authorization and signatures. The parties intend to file 6 consent judgment papers within the 14 day period. 7 8 THEREFORE, the parties jointly request that the Court stay all deadlines in this case for 14 days. 9 10 Dated: September 21, 2017 By:/s/ Robert F. McCauley Robert F. McCauley Attorneys for Plaintiff ASETEK DANMARK A/S Dated: September 21, 2017 By: /s/ Gordon M. Fauth Gordon M. Fauth, Jr. Attorneys for Defendants NEWEGG INC. and NEWEGG NORTH AMERICA INC. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ATTESTATION 18 19 20 I hereby attest that concurrence in the content and filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Defendants. 21 22 23 24 Dated: September 21, 2017 By:/s/ Robert F. McCauley Robert F. McCauley Attorneys for Plaintiff ASETEK DANMARK A/S 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-CV-7068-JST 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Having considered the foregoing joint stipulated request and finding that good cause exists to 3 stay this proceeding, it is HEREBY ORDERED that all deadlines in this matter are stayed for 14 4 days. 5 6 It is further ORDERED that the parties shall file consent judgment papers or an updated stipulated schedule within 14 days of this order. 7 8 9 10 September 21, 2017 Dated: ______________ The Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Court Judge Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR STAY AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 3:16-CV-7068-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?