Steinberg v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 4/6/2017. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 4/13/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/28/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838 GIDEON A. SCHOR, New York State Bar (admitted pro hac vice) AARON J. BENJAMIN, State Bar No. 301796 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 boris.feldman@wsgr.com gschor@wsgr.com abenjamin@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendants Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., Judy Bruner, Lloyd A. Carney, Renato A. DiPentima, Alan L. Earhart, John W. Gerdelman, Kim C. Goodman, David L. House, L. William Krause, David E. Roberson, and Sanjay Vaswani 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CHAILE STEINBERG, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, ) INC., JUDY BRUNER, LLOYD A. CARNEY, ) RENATO A. DIPENTIMA, ALAN L. ) EARHART, JOHN W. GERDELMAN, KIM C. ) GOODMAN, DAVID L. HOUSE, L. WILLIAM ) KRAUSE, DAVID E. ROBERSON, SANJAY ) VASWANI, BROADCOM LIMITED, ) BROADCOM CORPORATION, and BOBCAT ) MERGER SUB, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC -1- CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Before: Honorable Edward Milton Chen Complaint Filed: December 12, 2016 1 2 3 WHEREAS, plaintiff Chaile Steinberg (“Plaintiff”) filed the above-captioned securities class action lawsuit on December 12, 2016; WHEREAS, this action is subject to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation 4 Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”), 15 U.S.C. §78u-4, which, inter alia, requires the Court to 5 appoint a lead plaintiff; 6 WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016, the Court entered an Order setting an initial Case 7 Management Conference (“CMC”) for March 16, 2017 and setting Rule 26(f) and CMC deadlines 8 for March 9, 2017; 9 10 11 12 WHEREAS, the deadline for filing a motion seeking to be appointed lead plaintiff is March 6, 2017; WHEREAS, if appointed lead plaintiff by the Court, Plaintiff anticipates that it will file an amended complaint; 13 WHEREAS, defendants anticipate that they will move to dismiss the amended complaint; 14 WHEREAS, on February 15, 2017, this Court ordered, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, 15 that Defendants need not respond to the complaint and that the parties shall meet and confer on a 16 schedule after consolidation and the filing of a consolidated amended complaint; 17 WHEREAS, in light of the current procedural posture, and in particular, the fact that a lead 18 plaintiff has not yet been appointed, and a consolidated complaint has not been filed nor an 19 operative complaint designated, the parties respectfully request that the CMC and related 20 deadlines be continued as set forth below. 21 22 23 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, subject to Court approval, as follows: 1. The CMC is continued pending the appointment of a lead plaintiff and the subsequent 24 filing of an amended complaint or designation of an operative complaint. Likewise, 25 the deadline for filing a CMC statement is continued accordingly. 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC -2- 1 Dated: February 24, 2017 2 3 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation BORIS FELDMAN By: /s/ Boris Feldman Boris Feldman 4 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 493-6811 boris.feldman@wsgr.com 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., Judy Bruner, Lloyd A. Carney, Renato A. DiPentima, Alan L. Earhart, John W. Gerdelman, Kim C. Goodman, David L. House, L. William Krause, David E. Roberson, and Sanjay Vaswani 8 9 10 11 12 Dated: February 24, 2017 LATHAM & WATKINS LLP HILARY H. MATTIS 13 By: /s/ Hilary H. Mattis Hilary H. Mattis 14 15 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 328-4600 Facsimile: (650) 463-2600 Hilary.Mattis@lw.com 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendants Broadcom Limited, Broadcom Corporation, and Bobcat Merger Sub, Inc. 19 20 Dated: February 24, 2017 BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC EVAN J. SMITH 21 By: /s/ Evan J. Smith Evan J. Smith 22 Two Bala Plaza Suite 602 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 Telephone: 610-667-6200 Facsimile: 610-667-9029 Email: esmith@brodsky-smith.com 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiff 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC -3- 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. CMC is reset from RT U O 7 D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO 8 dwa Judge E 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC -4- A H ER LI RT 10 hen rd M. C NO 9 R NIA 6 FO 5 lead counsel.) Joint CMC Statement due 4/6/17. ISTRIC Dated: _______________________ _______________________________ ES D T 2/28/17 TEdward M. Chen C The Honorable TA United States District Judge S 4 3/16/17 to 4/13/17 at 1:30 p.m. (same time as motion to appoint UNIT ED 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 ATTESTATION 2 I, Boris Feldman, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT 4 CONFERENCE. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Evan J. 5 Smith and Hilary H. Mattis have concurred in this filing. 6 Dated: February 24, 2017 7 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation By: /s/ Boris Feldman Boris Feldman 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CMC Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?