Steinberg v. Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
35
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 4/6/2017. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 4/13/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/28/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
BORIS FELDMAN, State Bar No. 128838
GIDEON A. SCHOR, New York State Bar
(admitted pro hac vice)
AARON J. BENJAMIN, State Bar No. 301796
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
boris.feldman@wsgr.com
gschor@wsgr.com
abenjamin@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendants Brocade
Communications Systems, Inc., Judy Bruner,
Lloyd A. Carney, Renato A. DiPentima,
Alan L. Earhart, John W. Gerdelman, Kim C.
Goodman, David L. House, L. William Krause,
David E. Roberson, and Sanjay Vaswani
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CHAILE STEINBERG, Individually and On
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
BROCADE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS, )
INC., JUDY BRUNER, LLOYD A. CARNEY,
)
RENATO A. DIPENTIMA, ALAN L.
)
EARHART, JOHN W. GERDELMAN, KIM C. )
GOODMAN, DAVID L. HOUSE, L. WILLIAM )
KRAUSE, DAVID E. ROBERSON, SANJAY
)
VASWANI, BROADCOM LIMITED,
)
BROADCOM CORPORATION, and BOBCAT )
MERGER SUB, INC.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CMC
Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC
-1-
CASE NO.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Before: Honorable Edward Milton Chen
Complaint Filed: December 12, 2016
1
2
3
WHEREAS, plaintiff Chaile Steinberg (“Plaintiff”) filed the above-captioned securities
class action lawsuit on December 12, 2016;
WHEREAS, this action is subject to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
4
Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”), 15 U.S.C. §78u-4, which, inter alia, requires the Court to
5
appoint a lead plaintiff;
6
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2016, the Court entered an Order setting an initial Case
7
Management Conference (“CMC”) for March 16, 2017 and setting Rule 26(f) and CMC deadlines
8
for March 9, 2017;
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS, the deadline for filing a motion seeking to be appointed lead plaintiff is
March 6, 2017;
WHEREAS, if appointed lead plaintiff by the Court, Plaintiff anticipates that it will file an
amended complaint;
13
WHEREAS, defendants anticipate that they will move to dismiss the amended complaint;
14
WHEREAS, on February 15, 2017, this Court ordered, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation,
15
that Defendants need not respond to the complaint and that the parties shall meet and confer on a
16
schedule after consolidation and the filing of a consolidated amended complaint;
17
WHEREAS, in light of the current procedural posture, and in particular, the fact that a lead
18
plaintiff has not yet been appointed, and a consolidated complaint has not been filed nor an
19
operative complaint designated, the parties respectfully request that the CMC and related
20
deadlines be continued as set forth below.
21
22
23
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between
the undersigned, subject to Court approval, as follows:
1. The CMC is continued pending the appointment of a lead plaintiff and the subsequent
24
filing of an amended complaint or designation of an operative complaint. Likewise,
25
the deadline for filing a CMC statement is continued accordingly.
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CMC
Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC
-2-
1
Dated: February 24, 2017
2
3
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
BORIS FELDMAN
By: /s/ Boris Feldman
Boris Feldman
4
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 493-6811
boris.feldman@wsgr.com
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants Brocade
Communications Systems, Inc., Judy Bruner,
Lloyd A. Carney, Renato A. DiPentima,
Alan L. Earhart, John W. Gerdelman, Kim C.
Goodman, David L. House, L. William Krause,
David E. Roberson, and Sanjay Vaswani
8
9
10
11
12
Dated: February 24, 2017
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
HILARY H. MATTIS
13
By: /s/ Hilary H. Mattis
Hilary H. Mattis
14
15
140 Scott Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: (650) 328-4600
Facsimile: (650) 463-2600
Hilary.Mattis@lw.com
16
17
18
Attorneys for Defendants Broadcom Limited,
Broadcom Corporation, and Bobcat Merger Sub,
Inc.
19
20
Dated: February 24, 2017
BRODSKY & SMITH, LLC
EVAN J. SMITH
21
By: /s/ Evan J. Smith
Evan J. Smith
22
Two Bala Plaza
Suite 602
Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004
Telephone: 610-667-6200
Facsimile: 610-667-9029
Email: esmith@brodsky-smith.com
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Plaintiff
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CMC
Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC
-3-
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. CMC is reset from
RT
U
O
7
D
RDERE
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
AS MO
8
dwa
Judge E
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CMC
Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC
-4-
A
H
ER
LI
RT
10
hen
rd M. C
NO
9
R NIA
6
FO
5
lead counsel.) Joint CMC Statement due 4/6/17.
ISTRIC
Dated: _______________________
_______________________________
ES D
T
2/28/17
TEdward M. Chen C
The Honorable
TA
United States District Judge
S
4
3/16/17 to 4/13/17 at 1:30 p.m. (same time as motion to appoint
UNIT
ED
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
ATTESTATION
2
I, Boris Feldman, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT
4
CONFERENCE. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Evan J.
5
Smith and Hilary H. Mattis have concurred in this filing.
6
Dated: February 24, 2017
7
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
By: /s/ Boris Feldman
Boris Feldman
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING CMC
Case No.: 3:16-cv-07081-EMC
-5-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?