Corser v. Schreeder et al

Filing 33

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 1/23/2018. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/23/2018 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 GREG CORSER, Plaintiff, 10 11 12 13 No. C 16-7135 WHA (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. HANK SCHREEDER; MICHAEL DATZOLD; IAN H. BERNER; OFFICER WOODS; M. SPEDIACCI; JENEANE R. KUCKER, 14 Defendants. / 15 16 This is a civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. 1983 by a jail inmate proceeding pro 17 se. On October 26, 2017, the order to show cause was mailed to plaintiff at the address he 18 provided. The next day, the order was returned by the postal service as undeliverable because 19 plaintiff was not located at that address. Plaintiff has not notified the clerk of his current 20 address. Pursuant to Local Rule 3-11(b) — requiring parties to keep the court informed of their 21 current mailing address and stating that the failure to do so within sixty days of the return of 22 mail as undeliverable will result in dismissal of their case without prejudice — this case is 23 DISMISSED without prejudice. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: January 23, 2018. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?