Williams v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER re (53 in 3:17-cv-00661-JST) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers Company, (97 in 3:16-cv-07152-JST) STIPULATION WITH PR OPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, McKesson Corporation, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Case Management Statement due by 12/11/2017. Further Case Management Conference set for 12/20/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 30, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2017)

1

5

TIMOTHY M. CLARK (Bar No. 284447)
[e-mail]
LAUREN A. WELLING (Bar No. 291813)
[e-mail]
SANDERS PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, LLC
2860 Michelle Drive, Suite 220
Irvine, CA 92606
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7

DONALD F. ZIMMER, JR. (Bar No. 112279)
[e-mail]
WILLIAM E. STEIMLE (Bar No. 203426)
[e-mail]
KING & SPALDING LLP
101 Second Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

2
3
4

8
9
10
11

12 Attorneys for Defendants
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY,
13 ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP,
and MCKESSON CORPORATION
14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17 CAROLYN WILLIAMS,

Case No.: 3:16-CV-07152-JST

18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1

19

Plaintiff,
v.

20 ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS
LP, et al.,
21
Defendants.
22
23

Honorable Jon S. Tigar

AND RELATED ACTION:

24

Judge:

Michael Martin v. Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company, et al.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00661-JST

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1 - 3:16-CV-07152-JST

1
2
3

WHEREAS, a case management conference is scheduled for November 1, 2017, at 2:00
p.m. in this case and the related Martin case;
WHEREAS, plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss McKesson (Williams Doc. 81 and Martin Doc.

4 40) had also been scheduled for hearing on November 1, 2017.
5

WHEREAS, the Court entered an order granting plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss McKesson

6 without the need for oral argument on October 24, 2017 (Williams Doc. 96 and Martin Doc. 52)
7 and denying as moot Defendants’ motion for a determination of subject matter jurisdiction
8 (Williams Doc. 74 and Martin Doc. 39);
9

WHEREAS, on October 11, 2017, plaintiffs filed with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict

10 Litigation a motion to transfer for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings;
11

WHEREAS, the parties believe that, with the concurrent hearing of plaintiff’s motion to

12 dismiss McKesson being canceled and the limited items to be discussed at a case management
13 conference at this time, postponing the case management conference until after the ruling of the
14 Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation would promote judicial efficiency and economy;
15

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate as follows:

16

The case management conference scheduled for November 1, 2017, be continued to

17 December 20, 2017.
18 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19 DATED: October 27, 2017

SANDERS PHILLIPS GROSSMAN, LLC

20
21
22
23
24

DATED: October 27, 2017

By: /s/ Timothy M. Clark
Timothy M. Clark
Lauren Welling
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
KING & SPALDING LLP

25
26
27

By: /s/ William E. Steimle
Donald F. Zimmer, Jr.
William E. Steimle
Attorneys for Defendants

28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1

1

Signature Attestation (N.D. Cal. L.R. 5-1(i)(3))

2

I, William E. Steimle, attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

3

obtained from each signatory whose ECF user ID and password are not being used in the

4

electronic filing of this document.

5

///

6

///

7

///

8

///

9

///

10

///

11

///

12

///

13

///

14

///

15

///

16

///

17

///

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1

1

Having considered Plaintiffs’ and Defendants (collectively, the Parties’) Stipulation for

2

Order to Continue the November 1, 2017 case management conference, and good cause

3

appearing, the Parties’ Stipulation is GRANTED.

4
5

The November 1, 2017 case management conference is continued to December 20, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8
9

October 30, 2017
DATED: _____________

_____ _________________________________
HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO N.D. CAL. CIV. L.R. 6-1