Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/S
Filing
80
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 79 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation to Extend the Deadline regarding Submission of Damages Contentions filed by Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 28, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
William L. Buus (SBN 180059)
wbuus@schifferbuus.com
SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC
3070 Bristol St., Ste. 530
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attorneys for Defendant
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
Attorneys for Plainitff
ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.
8
9
Hubert H. Kuo (SBN 204036)
hku@ardentlawgroup.com
Alexander J. Chang (SBN 247921
aching@ardentlawgroup.com
ARDENT LAW GROUP, P.C.
2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 510
Irvine, CA 92612-1530
Telephone:
(949) 863-9782
Facsimile:
(949) 863-9783
Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
Jacob Schroeder (SBN 264717)
jacob.schroeder@finegan.com
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com
Arpita Bhattacharyya (pro hac vice)
arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant,
18
19
20
21
22
v.
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-07160-JST
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE REGARDING SUBMISSION
OF DAMAGES CONTENTIONS;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
Defendant and
Counterclaimant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
1
At the request of Asetek Danmark A/S’s (“Asetek”) counsel, Plaintiff Asia Vital
2
Components Co., Ltd. (“AVC”) and Defendant Asetek respectfully stipulate, with the Court’s
3
permission, to continue the deadline regarding the submission of Damages Contentions, as provided
4
below.
5
Asetek requests that the deadline for the submission of its Damages Contentions and AVC’s
6
Responsive Damages Contentions be continued by two weeks, which will have no impact on the
7
Court’s Claim Construction schedule. Asetek has requested this modification due to an unforeseen
8
development in another matter requiring Asetek’s counsel to respond to an extensive petition within
9
a week.
10
11
12
Accordingly, the parties’ stipulate and request that the Court modify the dates in the case
schedule as follows:
Event
Current Date
Proposed New Date
13
Damages Contentions
September 1, 2017
September 15, 2017
14
Responsive Damages Contentions
September 29, 2017
October 16, 2017
15
16
Dated: August 25, 2017
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
17
18
By: /s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya
Arpita Bhattacharyya
Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
19
20
21
22
Dated: August 25, 2017
ARDENT LAW GROUP, P.C.
23
24
25
By: /s/ William L. Buus
William L. Buus
Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
ATTESTATION
1
2
3
Counsel for Asetek Danmark A/S hereby attests by her signature below that concurrence in
the filing of this document was obtained from counsel for Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd.
4
5
Dated: August 25, 2017
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
6
7
8
9
By: /s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya
Arpita Bhattacharyya
Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
August 28, 2017
Dated: ________________________
_______________________________
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court
Northern District of California
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE DAMAGES CONTENTIONS
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?