Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd. v. Asetek Danmark A/S
Filing
85
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 84 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 81 MOTION to Amend/Correct Invalidity Contentions Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadlines Regarding Motion to Amend Invalidity Contentions; Proposed Order filed by Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 21, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
Jacob Schroeder (SBN 264717)
jacob.schroeder@finegan.com
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com
Arpita Bhattacharyya (pro hac vice)
arpita.bhattacharyya@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
(650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
10
Hubert H. Kuo (SBN 204036)
hku@ardentlawgroup.com
Alexander J. Chang (SBN 247921
aching@ardentlawgroup.com
ARDENT LAW GROUP, P.C.
2301 Dupont Drive, Suite 510
Irvine, CA 92612-1530
Telephone:
(949) 863-9782
Facsimile:
(949) 863-9783
William L. Buus (SBN 180059)
wbuus@schifferbuus.com
SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC
3070 Bristol St., Ste. 530
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Attorneys for Plainitff and Counterdefedant
ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.,
Plaintiff and
Counterdefendant,
18
19
v.
20
CASE NO. 3:16-cv-07160-JST
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES REGARDING MOTION
TO AMEND INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS; [PROPOSED]
ORDER
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
21
22
Defendant and
Counterclaimant.
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
1
At the request of Asetek Danmark A/S’s (“Asetek”) counsel, Plaintiff Asia Vital
2
Components Co., Ltd. (“AVC”) and Defendant Asetek respectfully stipulate, with the Court’s
3
permission, to continue remaining briefing deadlines regarding AVC’s Motion for Leave to Amend
4
Invalidity Contentions (“AVC’s Motion”), as provided below. These proposed changes will not
5
affect the hearing date and will provide the Court with two weeks to consider the fully briefed
6
motion.
7
Asetek’s current deadline to file its opposition to AVC’s Motion is September 29. Asetek
8
requests that its opposition be due two weeks later, on October 12. Asetek has requested this
9
modification because its opening claim construction brief for this case is also due on September 29
10
(the current due for Asetek’s opposition), Asetek’s counsel have been preparing and traveling for
11
depositions this week, and Asetek’s counsel also have significant submissions due in three inter
12
partes review proceedings soon after the current due date for Asetek’s opposition to AVC’s Motion.
13
Asetek respectfully requests the Court’s permission to continue the current due dates so that
14
Asetek’s counsel can fully consider and brief the matter.
15
16
Accordingly, the parties’ stipulate and request that the Court modify the briefing schedule as
follows:
Event
17
18
Asetek’s Opposition to AVC’s Motion
19
AVC’s Reply Supporting its Motion
20
Hearing date
Current Date
Proposed New Date
September 29, 2017
October 12, 2017
October 6, 2017
October 19, 2017
November 2, 2017
11/16/17No change
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
1
Dated: September 21, 2017
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
/s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya
Arpita Bhattacharyya
Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
6
7
Dated: September 21, 2017
SCHIFFER & BUUS, APC
8
By:
9
10
/s/ William L. Buus
William L. Buus
Attorney for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
ASIA VITAL COMPONENTS CO., LTD.
11
12
ATTESTATION
13
14
Counsel for Asetek Danmark A/S hereby attests by her signature below that concurrence in
15
the filing of this document was obtained from counsel for Asia Vital Components Co., Ltd.
16
Dated: September 21, 2017
17
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
18
19
20
By:
/s/ Arpita Bhattacharyya
Arpita Bhattacharyya
Attorney for Defendant and Counterclaimant
ASETEK DANMARK A/S
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
4
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The hearing date will be moved to November 16, 2017.
5
6
September 21, 2017
Dated: ________________________
_______________________________
7
The Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court
Northern District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:16-CV-07160-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?