Nanclares et al v. RPM Mortgage, Inc.

Filing 26

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 25 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)

1 BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP
FREDRICK S. LEVIN (State Bar No. 187603)
2 [e-mail]
ALI M. ABUGHEIDA (State Bar No. 285284)
3 [e-mail]
100 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1000
4 Santa Monica, California 90401
Telephone: [phone]
5 Facsimile: [phone]
6 Attorneys for Defendant RPM Mortgage, Inc.
7
8

100 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12 FRANCISCO NANCLARES, an individual;
CARL KNECHT, and individual; DAVID
13 GLASER, an individual; ANTONIO
RUGGIERO, and individual; and BRIAN
14 BYRNE, an individual on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
17
RPM MORTGAGE, INC., a California
18 corporation, and DOES 1-20, inclusive,
19

Case No. 3:16-cv-07188-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
THE MARCH 21, 2017 CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
ORDER
Judge:
Date:
Time:
Crtrm.:

Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
March 21, 2017
2:00 p.m.
10

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-07188-HSG
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil Local Rule 7-12, RPM Mortgage, Inc. (“RPM”) and Plaintiffs

2 Francisco Nanclares, Carl Knecht, David Glaser, Antonio Ruggerio, and Brian Byrne
3 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), mutually agree and respectfully request that this Court continue the
4 Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently set for Tuesday, March 21, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
5

The parties request this continuance in the interest of efficiency and judicial economy.

6 Currently, there are two motions before the Court that could eliminate the need for a CMC: RPM’s
7 pending motion to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 16 and 21) and Plaintiffs’ pending motion to remand (Dkt.
8 No. 17). Both of these motions are set for hearing on March 23, 2017.
9

Given the pending motions, the parties agree that it will be more efficient for the Court and

100 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]

BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP

10 for the parties to defer the CMC. If the action is still pending in this Court after those motions
11 have been ruled on, the parties agree to submit a stipulation with a proposed date and time for the
12 CMC within ten (10) days after entry of an order resolving those motions.
13
14
15 DATED: February 16, 2017

BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP

16
17

By:

18

/s/ Fredrick S. Levin
Fredrick S. Levin
Attorneys for Defendant RPM Mortgage, Inc.

19
20
21
22

DATED: February 16, 2017

DOSTART HANNINK & COVENEY LLP

23
24
25

By:

/s/ James T. Hannink
James T. Hannink
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-07188-HSG
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

1

*

2

*

*

ORDER

3
PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: February 23, 2017
6

_________________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

7
8
9

100 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 1000
SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 90401
TEL [phone] • FAX [phone]

BUCKLEYSANDLER LLP

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 3:16-cv-07188-HSG
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE