Espinosa v. Bluemercury, Inc. et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Answer and/or Otherwise Respond filed by Bluemercury, Inc., Macy's, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 23, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

SHAUN SETAREH, SB #204514
[e-mail]
THOMAS SEGAL, SB #222791
[e-mail]
SETAREH LAW GROUP
9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
SANDRA ESPINOSA
DAVID S. BRADSHAW, SB #44888
[e-mail]
NATHAN W. AUSTIN, SB #219672
[e-mail]
JACKSON LEWIS P.C.
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
BLUEMERCURY, INC. and MACY’S, INC.

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

SANDRA ESPINOSA, on behalf of herself,
all others similarly situated,

22
23

CLASS ACTION

Plaintiff,

20
21

Case No. 3:16-cv-07202-JST

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER AND/OR
OTHERWISE RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT

vs.
BLUEMERCURY, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; MACY'S, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive,
Defendants.

24
25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defs to Answer
and/or Otherwise Respond to Pltf’s Second Amended Complaint

Case No. 3:16-cv-07202-JST

1

Plaintiff Sandra Espinosa (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Bluemercury, Inc. and Macy’s, Inc.

2

(“Defendants”), through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate that Defendants’

3

time to file an answer and/or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint

4

[Dkt No. 46] is extended from September 1, 2017 up to and including September 18, 2017.

5

This extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.

6

No other extensions have been requested with respect to filing a responsive pleading to the

7

Second Amended Complaint.

8

Dated: August 22, 2017

SETAREH LAW GROUP

9
10

By: /s/ Shaun Setareh
Shaun Setareh
Thomas Segal

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
SANDRA ESPINOSA

13
14

Dated: August 22, 2017

JACKSON LEWIS P.C.

15
16

By: /s/ David S. Bradshaw
David S. Bradshaw

17

Attorneys for Defendants
BLUEMERCURY, INC. and
MACY’S, INC.

18
19
20
21
22

Signature Attestation by David S. Bradshaw
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has
been obtained from Plaintiff’s counsel.

23
[PROPOSED] ORDER

24
25
26

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:_August 23, 2017

27
28

Hon. Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
4841-8612-5133, v. 1

2

Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Time for Defs to Answer
and/or Otherwise Respond to Pltf’s Second Amended Complaint

Case No. 3:16-cv-07202-JST