Espinosa v. Bluemercury, Inc. et al

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 52 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Dismissal filed by Bluemercury, Inc., Macy's, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SHAUN SETAREH, SB #204514 shaun@setarehlaw.com THOMAS SEGAL, SB #222791 thomas@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 907 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Telephone: (310) 888-7771 Facsimile: (310) 888-0109 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDRA ESPINOSA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 DAVID S. BRADSHAW, SB #44888 bradshawd@jacksonlewis.com NATHAN W. AUSTIN, SB #219672 austinn@jacksonlewis.com JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 341-0404 Facsimile: (916) 341-0141 Attorneys for Defendants BLUEMERCURY, INC. and MACY’S, INC. 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 SANDRA ESPINOSA, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, Case No. 3:16-cv-07202-JST CLASS ACTION 19 Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND CLASS/COLLECTIVE/REPRESENTATIVE CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE 20 vs. 21 22 BLUEMERCURY, INC., a Delaware Corporation; MACY'S, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 to 100, Inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Stip & [Proposed] Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Individual Claims with Prejudice & Class/Collective/Representative Claims Without Prejudice Case No. 3:16-cv-07202-JST 1 Plaintiff Sandra Espinosa and Defendants Bluemercury, Inc. and Macy’s, Inc., by 2 and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to the dismissal of Plaintiff 3 Sandra Espinosa’s (“Plaintiff”) individual claims against Bluemercury, Inc. and Macy’s, Inc. with 4 prejudice, the dismissal of Plaintiff’s class/collective/representative claims against Bluemercury, 5 Inc. and Macy’s, Inc. without prejudice, and the dismissal of the action in its entirety with each 6 party to bear her/its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 7 Dated: September 15, 2017 SETAREH LAW GROUP 8 By: /s/ Shaun Setareh Shaun Setareh Thomas Segal 9 10 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDRA ESPINOSA 11 12 13 Dated: September 15, 2017 JACKSON LEWIS P.C. 14 By: /s/ David S. Bradshaw David S. Bradshaw 15 16 Attorneys for Defendants BLUEMERCURY, INC. and MACY’S, INC. 17 18 Signature Attestation by David S. Bradshaw 19 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has 20 been obtained from Plaintiff’s counsel. 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER 23 24 25 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2017 26 Hon. Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge4837-2408-8399, v. 1 27 28 2 Stip & [Proposed] Order Dismissing Plaintiff’s Individual Claims with Prejudice & Class/Collective/Representative Claims Without Prejudice Case No. 3:16-cv-07202-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?