Ainsworth v. Santa Cruz Superior Court
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 5/8/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MAURICE L. AINSWORTH,
Case No. 16-cv-07210-VC (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT
SANTA CRUZ SUPERIOR COURT,
Petitioner Maurice L. Ainsworth is a state prisoner who filed a pro se petition for a writ
of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging his conviction in the Santa Cruz
County Superior Court. On February 28, 2017, the Court issued an Order for Petitioner to
Provide Notice About How He Wishes to Proceed. See ECF No. 10. The Court noted that, from
the face of the petition, it appeared that none of Ainsworth’s claims had been exhausted in state
court. The Court explained that, under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act,
claims presented in a federal habeas petition must first be exhausted in state court and, because
Ainsworth’s claims had not been exhausted, he had two options about how to proceed. The
Court granted Ainsworth 28 days in which to notify the Court about how he wished to proceed
and, if he did not respond within 28 days, the Court would assume that he chose option (1), to
dismiss the action and return to state court to exhaust all claims before returning to federal court
to present his newly exhausted claims in a new petition.
Twenty-eight days have passed and Ainsworth has not filed a notice about how he wishes
to proceed. Accordingly, the Court assumes he is choosing option (1) and dismisses this action
without prejudice. After Ainsworth exhausts his claims in state court, he may file a new petition
with fully exhausted claims.
The Clerk of the Court shall terminate all pending motions, enter a separate judgment and
close this file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 8, 2017
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?