Robey v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 38 Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 3/29/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2018 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edw on 1/31/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11 MICHAEL ROBEY, MOE ASGHARNIA and
JAMES COMB, Individually and On Behalf of a
12 Class of Similarly Situated Individuals,
Case No. 3:16-cv-07212-EMC
13
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15 TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., and
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION,
16
Defendants.
17
[Assigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen]
PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED
REQUEST TO CONTINUE ADR
DEADLINE AND CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Complaint Filed:
1st Amended Complaint:
December 16, 2016
April 7, 2017
18 _______________________________________
19
The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation and good cause having
20
21 been shown, ORDERS that:
22
1.
23
The ADR deadline be continued from February 25, 2018 to March 7,
24 2018.
25
26
27
28
1
PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE
AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-07212-EMC
1
2.
The case management conference currently set for March 1, 2018 be
2 continued to April 5, 2018.
ER
R NIA
A
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE
SUITE 2100
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP
10
dwa
Judge E
H
9
RT
8
NO
7
By: ________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EDWARD M. M. Chen
CHEN
rd
FO
1/31/18
6 DATED:_____________
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
5
UNIT
ED
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
4
S
3
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE
AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. 3:16-cv-07212-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?