Robey v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 40

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 38 Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 3/29/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/5/2018 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edw on 1/31/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 8 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 MICHAEL ROBEY, MOE ASGHARNIA and JAMES COMB, Individually and On Behalf of a 12 Class of Similarly Situated Individuals, Case No. 3:16-cv-07212-EMC 13 CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC., and TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, 16 Defendants. 17 [Assigned to Hon. Edward M. Chen] PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Complaint Filed: 1st Amended Complaint: December 16, 2016 April 7, 2017 18 _______________________________________ 19 The Court, having considered the parties’ Stipulation and good cause having 20 21 been shown, ORDERS that: 22 1. 23 The ADR deadline be continued from February 25, 2018 to March 7, 24 2018. 25 26 27 28 1 PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:16-cv-07212-EMC 1 2. The case management conference currently set for March 1, 2018 be 2 continued to April 5, 2018. ER R NIA A N F D IS T IC T O R C 11 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SUITE 2100 LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 DYKEMA GOSSETT LLP 10 dwa Judge E H 9 RT 8 NO 7 By: ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE EDWARD M. M. Chen CHEN rd FO 1/31/18 6 DATED:_____________ D RDERE OO IT IS S LI 5 UNIT ED IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 4 S 3 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 PROPOSED ORDER RE STIPULATED REQUEST TO CONTINUE ADR DEADLINE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Case No. 3:16-cv-07212-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?