Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Tigran Gumushyan et al
ORDER denying Mr. Lopez's request to proceed IFP on appeal. ECF Nos. 117, 120. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/6/2017. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ,
TIGRAN GUMUSHYAN, et al.,
Re: ECF Nos. 117 & 120
Ricardo Calderon Lopez filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.1 The court denied it
and asked Mr. Lopez to clarify what he sought: IFP status in this court or in aid of his appeal
before the Ninth Circuit.2 Mr. Lopez responded to the court’s order.3 As best the court can tell, he
intended the IFP application to support his appeal of the undersigned’s order denying his
withdrawal of consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction.4
The court construes Mr. Lopez’s application as a motion for leave to proceed IFP under
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a). Under that rule, “a party to a district-court action who
desires to appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” Fed. R. App. P.
ECF No. 117.
Order – ECF No. 119 at 2.
Response – ECF No. 120.
See id. at 1, 2.
ORDER — No. 16-cv-07236-LB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?