Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez v. Tigran Gumushyan et al

Filing 123

ORDER denying Mr. Lopez's request to proceed IFP on appeal. ECF Nos. 117, 120. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/6/2017. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ, Case No.16-cv-07236-LB Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 15 TIGRAN GUMUSHYAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Re: ECF Nos. 117 & 120 Ricardo Calderon Lopez filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis.1 The court denied it 17 18 and asked Mr. Lopez to clarify what he sought: IFP status in this court or in aid of his appeal 19 before the Ninth Circuit.2 Mr. Lopez responded to the court’s order.3 As best the court can tell, he 20 intended the IFP application to support his appeal of the undersigned’s order denying his 21 withdrawal of consent to magistrate-judge jurisdiction.4 The court construes Mr. Lopez’s application as a motion for leave to proceed IFP under 22 23 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a). Under that rule, “a party to a district-court action who 24 desires to appeal in forma pauperis must file a motion in the district court.” Fed. R. App. P. 25 1 ECF No. 117. 2 Order – ECF No. 119 at 2. 27 3 Response – ECF No. 120. 28 4 See id. at 1, 2. 26 ORDER — No. 16-cv-07236-LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?