Siqueiros v. General Motors LLC

Filing 102

ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting #101 Motion for Leave to File Partial Motion for Reconsideration; no further filing is necessary. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MONTEVILLE SLOAN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

v.
GENERAL MOTORS LLC,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS'
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE MOTION FOR PARTIAL
RECONSIDERATION
Docket No. 101

12
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

11

Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC

13

Plaintiffs request leave to file a motion for reconsideration because of an apparent

14

scrivener’s error in the Court’s order regarding Defendant General Motors’ motion to dismiss. See

15

Docket No. 99. In particular, the Court’s order stated that it had dismissed Count 92, Ohio

16

Plaintiffs Gulling and Jones’ claim for “implied warranty in tort” under Ohio law. Id. at 45. In

17

fact, the Court intended to dismiss Plaintiffs Gulling and Jones’ claims under the Magnuson-Moss

18

Warranty Act, Count 1, to the extent they were premised on a claim for “implied warranty in tort,”

19

raised separately as Count 92. For that reason, Count 92 remains in the case. Plaintiffs’ request

20

for clarification, unopposed by GM, is GRANTED; Plaintiffs need not file a motion for

21

reconsideration.

22

This order disposes of Docket No. 101.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 5, 2018
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge