Siqueiros v. General Motors LLC
Filing
94
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #91 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER RE ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION filed by Dennis Vita, Derick Bradford, Edwin Doepel, Joseph Olivier, Katelyn Doepel, Marc Perkins, Rudy Sanchez, Bradley K. Zierke, Ted Edgecomb, Gabriel Del Valle, Dan Madson, James Robertson, Drew Peterson, Christopher Thacker, Mike Warpinski, James Faulkner, Joshua Byrge, Steve Kitchen, Joseph Brannan, Todd Cralley, Thomas Shorter, Steven Ehrke, Larry Goodwin, Jill Cralley, John Neubauer, Michael Ware, Kevin Hanneken, Donald Ludington, Ross Dahl, Jonas Bednarek, Barbara Molina, William Martell, Kelly Harris, Bill Mauch, Raul Siqueiros, John Graziano, Scott Smith, Gail Lannom, Monteville Sloan, Jr., Ronald Jones, Doepel Katelyn, Randy Clausen, Thomas Gulling. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/9/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
MONTEVILLE SLOAN, JR., RAUL
SIQUEIROS, TODD AND JILL CRALLEY,
JOSEPH BRANNAN, LARRY GOODWIN,
MARC PERKINS, DONALD LUDINGTON,
THOMAS SHORTER, DERICK BRADFORD,
GABRIEL DEL VALLE, KEVIN
HANNEKEN, EDWIN AND KATELYN
DOEPEL, DAN MADSON, JAMES
FAULKNER, JOSEPH OLIVIER, SCOTT
SMITH, ROSS DAHL, DREW PETERSON,
MICHAEL WARE, STEVE KITCHEN,
BARBARA MOLINA, DENNIS VITA,
STEVEN EHRKE, THOMAS GULLING,
RONALD JONES, MIKE WARPINSKI,
WILLIAM MARTELL, JOHN GRAZIANO,
JOSHUA BYRGE, RUDY SANCHEZ,
CHRISTOPHER THACKER, RANDY
CLAUSEN, KELLY HARRIS, JAMES
ROBERTSON, and JONAS BEDNAREK,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: 16-cv-07244-EMC
ESI STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
v.
GENERAL MOTORS LLC,
Defendant.
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
The procedures and protocols outlined herein govern the production of electronically stored
2
information (“ESI”) and paper documents by the Parties during the pendency of this litigation. The
3
production formats for any other materials will be addressed by the parties after a meet and confer
4
regarding the specific item or category of items.
5
A.
6
Duty of Cooperation
The parties acknowledge their duty to work together cooperatively throughout the discovery
7
process.
8
B.
9
Definitions
1.
“Document” is defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the usage of
10
this term in Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The term “Document” shall
11
include Hard-Copy Documents, Electronic Documents, and ESI as defined herein.
12
2.
“Electronic Document or Data” means Documents or Data existing in electronic form
13
at the time of collection, including but not limited to: e-mail or other means of electronic
14
communications, word processing files (e.g., Microsoft Word), computer presentations (e.g.,
15
PowerPoint slides), spreadsheets (e.g., Excel), and image files (e.g., PDF).
16
17
18
19
20
3.
“Electronically stored information” or “ESI,” as used herein has the same meaning as
in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 34.
4.
“Hard-Copy Document” means Documents existing in paper form at the time of
collection.
5.
“Native Format” means and refers to the format of ESI in which it was generated
21
and/or as used by the producing party in the usual course of its business and in its regularly conducted
22
activities. For example, the native format of an Excel workbook is a .xls or .xslx file.
23
6.
“Metadata” means: (i) information embedded in or associated with a native file that is
24
not ordinarily viewable or printable from the application that generated, edited, or modified such native
25
file which describes the characteristics, origins, usage, and/or validity of the electronic file; and (ii)
26
information generated automatically by the operation of a computer or other information technology
27
system when a native file is created, modified, transmitted, deleted, or otherwise manipulated by a user
28
of such system.
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
2
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
7.
“Field Data” means (i) information, such as Bates numbers, created during the course of
2
processing documents or ESI for production; and (ii) information collected during the course of
3
collecting documents or ESI, such as the name of the media device on which it was stored, or the
4
custodian or non-custodial data source from which it was collected.
5
6
7
8
9
8.
“Media” means an object or device, real or virtual, including but not limited to a disc,
tape, computer, or other device on which data is or was stored.
9.
“Optical Character Recognition” or “OCR” means the process of recognizing, and
creating a file containing, visible text within an image.
10.
“Hash Value” is a unique numerical identifier that can be assigned to a file, a group of
10
files, or a portion of a file, based on a standard mathematical algorithm applied to the characteristics of
11
the data set. The most commonly used algorithms, known as MD5 and SHA, will generate numerical
12
values so distinctive that the chance that any two data sets will have the same Hash Value, no matter
13
how similar they appear, is less than one in one billion. “Hashing” is used to guarantee the authenticity
14
of an original data set and can be used as a digital equivalent of the Bates stamp used in Hard-Copy
15
Document productions.
16
17
18
11.
“Confidentiality Designation” means the legend affixed to Protected Documents as
defined by, and subject to, the terms of any protective order entered in this litigation.
12.
“Searchable Text” means the native text extracted from an Electronic Document and
19
any Optical Character Recognition text (“OCR text”) generated from a Hard-Copy Document or
20
electronic image.
21
13.
“Load files” means electronic files provided with a production set of documents and
22
images used to load that production set into a receiving party’s document review platform, and
23
correlate its data within that platform.
24
25
26
27
28
14.
“And” and “or” shall be construed conjunctively or disjunctively as necessary to make
their use inclusive rather than exclusive, e.g., “and” shall be construed to mean “and/or.”
15.
“Include” and “Including” shall be construed to mean “include but not be limited to”
and “including, but not limited to.”
16.
Reference to the singular shall also be deemed to refer to the plural, and vice-versa.
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
3
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
C.
2
Preservation
1.
The Parties represent that they have issued litigation hold notices to those custodians
3
with data, and persons or entities responsible for maintenance of non-custodial data, which possibly
4
contain discoverable information.
5
6
2.
All backup or archive media which may contain discoverable ESI not otherwise
available have been pulled from rotation and are being preserved.
7
3.
All processes and procedures which would result in the elimination, or transfer to a less
8
accessible medium, of any unpreserved data and associated metadata which would otherwise be
9
required to be preserved or produced have been suspended.
10
4.
Within twenty-one (21) days from entry of this Order, Defendant will identify all ESI
11
preservation systems, including back-up, archive and disaster recovery systems, and all associated
12
policies, processes and procedures, including those related to the deletion, removal or transfer of data
13
from a location.
14
D.
15
16
17
Document and Data Sources
1.
Within twenty-one (21) days from entry of this Order, Defendant shall identify and
describe all non-custodial data sources which possibly contain discoverable information.
2.
Sources of non-custodial documents and sources include databases, file servers, SANs,
18
NASs, email servers, web servers, online data storage such as Dropbox, document management
19
systems (DMS), record management systems (RMS), content management systems (CMS),
20
departmental/project/collaborative/shared storage spaces, e-rooms, structured data stores, application
21
data, source code repositories, social media and hard-copy document repositories.
22
23
24
3.
Within twenty-one (21) days from entry of this Order, Defendant shall identify the
names, titles and roles of custodians who possibly have discoverable information.
4.
Sources of custodial documents and ESI include local hard drives, network home or
25
personal file shares, removable storage, email, removable storage media, online data storage such as
26
Dropbox, messaging phones, tablets, social media, and physical files.
27
28
5.
Within thirty (30) days from Defendant’s identification of custodial and non-custodial
data sources, Plaintiffs may identify additional custodial and non-custodial data sources for inclusion
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
4
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
under this order. Plaintiffs reserve the right to request, at any time prior to the close of discovery,
2
inclusion of additional custodians or non-custodial data sources whose relevance was discovered via
3
documents or data produced, or testimony given, after the initial designations by Defendant and
4
Plaintiffs, or for other good cause shown. If the Defendant object to the inclusion of such non-custodial
5
or custodial sources, the Parties will meet and confer to resolve the matter; if the Parties cannot reach
6
resolution, the Court or its designee will determine the matter.
7
6.
Documents and ESI from custodial and non-custodial data sources that may contain
8
information relevant to this litigation will be preserved pending identification of data to be produced
9
into this litigation.
10
7.
Defendant has a continuing obligation to identify any custodial and non-custodial data
11
sources that may contain information relevant to this litigation, and preserve them.
12
E.
Identification of Responsive ESI
13
The parties will meet and confer on the methodology (e.g., keyword/Boolean search,
14
technology-assisted review (TAR) such as concept search, predictive coding, etc.) and implementation
15
(e.g., search terms, etc.) to be used to identify and search ESI. Any such agreed-upon methodology
16
does not relieve the parties of their continuing obligation to identify data sources and produce discrete
17
document collections that contain information relevant to this litigation. A party may not withhold or
18
decline to review a document known to be relevant or responsive to a discovery request on the basis
19
that it was not discovered or identified through the agreed-upon search methodology.
20
F.
Discrete Document Collections.
21
Identified discrete document collections, such as communications with regulatory agencies or
22
government entities shall be produced in their entirety without regard to whether or not each document
23
in the collection has been identified as possibly responsive, or deemed to be or classified as, responsive,
24
or, if search terms are used, contains a search term, except that privileged documents in such a
25
collection may be withheld and listed in a privilege log as specified elsewhere in this order.
26
G.
Other Filtering or Culling Technologies.
27
Prior to use by either Party, the Parties must meet and confer to disclose and discuss any other
28
proposed use of technologies not specified herein to reduce the number of documents to be reviewed or
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
5
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
produced (i.e., file type culling, e-mail thread suppression, etc.). Use of these technologies to reduce
2
the reviewable collection or production, other than as described, requires the consent of either Party and
3
will be subject to a separate mutually agreeable protocol for the use of such technologies to be
4
negotiated by the Parties.
5
H.
6
Production Format and Processing Specifications
1.
Except as otherwise provided herein, the Parties will produce ESI in TIFF format with
7
extracted searchable text and applicable metadata as specified in Attachment A. with the exception of
8
the following file types that, to the extent produced, shall be produced in their native file format with an
9
accompanying placeholder image:
10
- Spreadsheets;
11
- Audio files;
12
- Photos (jpg and jpeg); and
13
- Video files.
14
Redacted ESI will be produced as TIFFs and OCR’ed searchable text. Hard-copy documents
15
will be scanned and produced as TIFFs, with applicable metadata as set out in Attachment A, and
16
OCR’ed searchable text.
17
2.
Embedded Objects. OLE embedded objects (embedded MS Office files, etc.) shall be
18
extracted as separate files and treated as an attachment to the parent document. Images embedded in
19
emails shall not be extracted and produced separately.
20
3.
Load Files. Productions will include image load files in Opticon or IPRO format as well
21
as Concordance format data (.dat) files with the metadata fields identified in Attachment A for all
22
included documents. All metadata will be produced in UTF-16LE or UTF-8 with Byte Order Mark
23
format.
24
4.
Foreign Language Documents. Hard-copy documents and ESI that contain languages
25
other than English, in whole or in part, shall be produced in the original language(s), along with all
26
machine translations of the searchable text, as well as any other existing translations. Any subsequent
27
translations in the possession of the producing party shall also be produced within seven (7) days after
28
their creation.
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
6
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
5.
Text Files. A single text file shall be provided for each document. The text file name
2
shall be the same as the Bates number of the first page of the document with the document extension
3
“.txt” suffixed. Files names shall not have any special characters or embedded spaces. Electronic text
4
must be extracted directly from the native electronic file unless the document requires redaction, is an
5
image file, or is any other native electronic file that does not contain text to extract (e.g., non-searchable
6
PDFs). In these instances, and in the case of imaged hard-copy documents, a text file shall be created
7
using OCR and shall be produced in lieu of extracted text. Extracted text shall be provided in UTF-
8
16LE or UTF-8 with Byte Order Mark format text.
9
revisions, tracked changes, speaker’s notes and text from documents with comments or tracked
10
Extracted text shall include all comments,
changes, and hidden worksheets, slides, columns and rows.
11
6.
OCR. OCR should be sufficient to allow searching in any standard platform.
12
7.
Text Extracted from Emails.
Text extracted from emails shall include all header
13
information that would be visible if the email was viewed in Outlook including: (1) the individuals to
14
whom the communication was directed (“To”), (2) the author of the email communication (“From”),
15
(3) who was copied and blind copied on such email (“CC” and “BCC”), (4) the subject line of the email
16
(“RE” or “Subject”), (5) the date and time of the email, and (6) the names of any attachments.
17
8.
TIFFs. All TIFFs produced by any party in this matter will be single page Group IV
18
TIFF format, 300 dpi quality or better. Image file names will be identical to the corresponding bates
19
numbered images, with a “.tif” file extension. All images of redacted documents which contain
20
comments, deletions and revision marks (including the identity of the person making the deletion or
21
revision and the date and time thereof), speaker notes, or other user-entered data that the source
22
application can display to the user will be processed such that all that data is visible in the image. The
23
producing party will brand all TIFF images in the lower right-hand corner with its corresponding bates
24
number, using a consistent font type and size. The Bates number must not obscure any part of the
25
underlying image.
26
underlying image, the Bates number should be placed as near to that position as possible while
27
preserving the underlying image.
If the placement in the lower right-hand corner will result in obscuring the
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
7
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
9.
TIFFs of Redacted ESI. TIFFs of redacted ESI shall convey the same information and
2
image as the original document, including all non-redacted elements and formatting which are visible in
3
any view of the document in its native application. and each redacted area must bear a label containing
4
the reason for the redaction.
5
10.
Explanation of Inability to Produce Metadata.
If the producing party is unable to
6
produce metadata for a particular field or ESI document, it will provide an explanation of that inability
7
with its document production. The Parties shall then meet and confer to attempt to resolve the
8
problems.
9
11.
Native File Image Placeholders.
A Bates-stamped placeholder TIFF, bearing the
10
legend “This document has been produced in native format” shall be provided for ESI produced in
11
native format; these placeholders will be Bates numbered in the same way as any other TIFF, and the
12
Bates number of that single page shall be used as the BegBates and EndBates of the associated
13
document.
14
12.
Audio Visual Files. Audio and video files are to be produced in the native file format in
15
which they were maintained in the ordinary course of business. Audio files in non-standard formats
16
should be produced in MP3 format.
17
13.
Databases, Structured, Aggregated or Application Data. The Parties will meet and
18
confer to address the production and production format of any responsive data contained in a database
19
or other structured or aggregated data source or otherwise maintained by an application. Prior to any
20
such meet and confer, Defendant will provide sufficient information to enable the Plaintiffs to evaluate
21
the best method and format of production, including such information as the database or data store
22
name, business purpose, database or data source owner, database schema, tables, column/field
23
definitions, standard reports, export capabilities, and administrator, programmer and user manuals. If
24
the parties cannot reach agreement, the matter will be decided by the Court or its designee.
25
14.
Lost, Destroyed or Irretrievable ESI. If a Party learns that responsive ESI that once
26
existed was lost, destroyed, or is no longer retrievable as a result of acts or circumstances not occurring
27
in the ordinary course of business, the Party shall comply with its obligations under the Federal Rules
28
of Civil Procedure to explain where and when the responsive ESI was last retrievable in its original
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
8
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
format and to disclose the circumstances surrounding the change in status of that responsive ESI,
2
whether that information is available from other sources, and whether any backup or copy of such
3
original responsive ESI exists. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to expand or limit the obligations
4
under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
5
15.
Scanning of Hard-Copy Documents. In scanning paper documents, documents are to be
6
produced as they are kept in the ordinary course of business. For documents found in folders or other
7
containers with labels, tabs, or other identifying information, such labels and tabs shall be scanned
8
where practicable. Pages with Post-It notes shall be scanned both with and without the Post-it, with the
9
image of the page with the Post-it preceding the image of the page without the Post-It. The Parties will
10
use best efforts to unitize documents (i.e., distinct documents should not be merged into a single record,
11
and a single document should not be split into multiple records), and maintain document relationships,
12
i.e., attachment status. Original document orientation (i.e., portrait v. landscape) should be maintained.
13
16.
Proprietary Software. To the extent that relevant ESI cannot be rendered or reviewed
14
without the use of proprietary software, the parties shall meet and confer to minimize any expense or
15
burden associated with the production of such documents in an acceptable format, including issues as
16
may arise with respect to obtaining access to any such software and operating manuals.
17
17.
Redactions. Documents containing redactions (e.g., pursuant to attorney-client privilege)
18
will be produced in TIFF image format. OCR reflecting redactions will be provided in text files. When
19
a document is redacted or withheld for attorney-client privilege or work product, all metadata on a
20
family level is excluded from the metadata file (.DAT). Documents with embedded objects that are
21
redacted or withheld from production will be produced in TIFF image format.
22
18.
De-duplication. A producing party may de-duplicate a production vertically (i.e., within
23
individual custodians) or horizontally (i.e., across different custodians) provided that horizontal de-
24
duplication will necessitate the inclusion of information for all other custodians for which the
25
documents have been de-duplicated in an ”Other Custodians” metadata field produced in the delimited
26
text file containing the other metadata fields as specified herein.
27
28
19.
Color. Paper documents or redacted ESI that contain color necessary to decipher the
meaning, context, or content of the document or ESI shall be produced as single-page, 300 DPI JPG
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
9
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
images with JPG compression and a high quality setting as to not degrade the original image.
2
20.
Encrypted or Password-Protected ESI. For any ESI that exists in encrypted format or is
3
password-protected, the producing party will provide the receiving party a means to gain access to
4
those native files (for example, by supplying passwords.)
5
21.
Parent-Child Relationships.
Parent-child relationships (the association between an
6
attachment and its parent document or between embedded documents and their parent) shall be
7
preserved.
8
22.
Family Groups. A document and all other documents in its attachment range, emails
9
with attachments, and files with extracted embedded OLE documents all constitute family groups. If
10
any member of a family group is produced, all members of that group must also be produced or else
11
logged as privileged, and no such member shall be withheld from production as a duplicate.
12
23.
Production Media. The producing party will use SFTP when appropriate for its ESI
13
production, and will cooperate in good faith to use the highest-capacity available media to minimize
14
associated overhead. Any replacement Production Media will cross-reference the original Production
15
Media, clearly identify that it is a replacement, and cross-reference the Bates Number range that is
16
being replaced.
17
24.
Write Protection and Preservation.
All computer media that is capable of write
18
protection should be write-protected before production.
19
I.
Privilege Log.
20
Within a reasonable time after each production, but no more than forty-five (45) days after each
21
production, Defendant shall provide Plaintiffs with a log of the documents withheld or redacted for
22
privilege from that production with a log populated exclusively with the following extracted metadata
23
fields: Custodian(s), From, To, CC, BCC, Subject, File Name, File Path, Date Created, Date Last
24
Modified, Basis of Withholding/Redaction. If there is more than one redaction, each redaction shall be
25
addressed in the log with sufficient information to allow Plaintiffs to understand the basis for the
26
redactions. Forwarded emails withheld from disclosure or redacted shall be separately logged. In
27
addition to providing the requested privilege log withint a reasonablle time after Plaintiffs’ request,
28
Defendant shall provide a list of in-house and outside attorneys.
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
10
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
2
J.
General Provisions.
1.
Any practice or procedure set forth herein may be varied by written agreement of the
3
Parties, where such variance is deemed appropriate to facilitate the timely and economical exchange of
4
electronic data or other covered discovery materials.
5
2.
Should any Party subsequently determine in good faith that it cannot proceed as required
6
by this order or that the order requires modification, the Parties will meet and confer to resolve any
7
dispute before seeking Court intervention.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3.
Regardless of the foregoing, the Parties retain the obligation to produce, or log for
privilege, all responsive documents of which they are aware.
Approved as to form and content and respectfully submitted by:
DATED: January 3, 2018
/s/ Jennie Lee Anderson
Jennie Lee Anderson
Lori E. Andrus
ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP
155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415-986-1400
jennie@andrusanderson.com
lori@andrusanderson.com
Adam J. Levitt (pro hac vice)
Mark A. DiCello (pro hac vice)
John E. Tangren (pro hac vice)
Daniel R. Ferri (pro hac vice)
DICELLO LEVITT & CASEY LLC
Ten North Dearborn Street, Eleventh Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60602
Telephone: 312-214-7900
alevitt@dlcfirm.com
dferri@dlcfirm.com
jtangren@dlcfirm.com
W. Daniel “Dee” Miles, III (pro hac vice)
H. Clay Barnett, III (pro hac vice)
Archie I. Grubb, II (pro hac vice)
Andrew E. Brashier (pro hac vice)
BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW,
METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C.
272 Commerce Street
Montgomery, Alabama 36104
Telephone: 334-269-2343
Dee.Miles@Beasleyallen.com
Clay.Barnett@BeasleyAllen.com
Archie.Grubb@Beasleyallen.com
Andrew.Brashier@Beasleyallen.com
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
11
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Nicholas R. Rockforte (pro hac vice to be filed)
Christopher L. Coffin (pro hac vice to be filed)
PENDLEY, BAUDIN & COFFIN, L.L.P.
1515 Poydras Street, Suite 1400
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112
Telephone: 504-355-0086
nrockforte@pbclawfirm.com
ccoffin@pbclawfirm.com
Marcus Rael (pro hac vice motion to be filed)
ROBLES, RAEL & ANAYA, P.C.
500 Marquette NW, Suite 700
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
Telephone: 505-242-2228
marcus@roblesrael.com
Anthony J. Garcia, Esq. (pro hac vice)
AG LAW
742 South Village Circle
Tampa, Florida 33606
Telephone: 813-259-9555
anthony@aglawinc.com
Timothy J. Becker (pro hac vice)
JOHNSON BECKER, PLLC
444 Cedar Street, Suite 1800
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Telephone: 612-436-1800
tbecker@johnsonbecker.com
Ben Finley (pro hac vice motion to be filed)
THE FINLEY FIRM, P.C.
200 13th Street
Columbus, Georgia 31901
Telephone: 706-322-6226
bfinley@thefinleyfirm.com
22
Eric J. Haag (pro hac vice)
ATTERBURY, KAMMER & HAAG, S.C.
8500 Greenway Boulevard, Suite 103
Middleton, Wisconsin 53562
Telephone: 608-821-4600
ehaag@wiscinjurylawyers.com
23
Counsel for Plaintiffs
24
/s/ Joseph J. Ybarra
Joseph J. Ybarra (SBN 218130)
Joseph.Ybarra@hysmlaw.com
HUANG YBARRA GELBERG & MAY LLP
550 South Hope Street, Suite 1850
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: 213-884-4902
20
21
25
26
27
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
12
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
3
Gregory R. Oxford (SBN 62333)
goxford@icclawfirm.com
ISAACS CLOUSE CROSE & OXFORD LLP
21515 Hawthorne Boulevard, Suite 950
Torrance, California 90503
Telephone: 310-316-1990
4
Attorneys for Defendant General Motors LLC
1
2
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
13
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
2
3
ECF CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence
regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document.
4
5
Date: January 3, 2018
By:
6
/s/ Jennie Lee Anderson
Jennie Lee Anderson
7
8
Jennie Lee Anderson
Lori E. Andrus
ANDRUS ANDERSON LLP
155 Montgomery Street, Suite 900
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: 415-986-1400
jennie@andrusanderson.com
lori@andrusanderson.com
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
14
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
1
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, SO ORDERED.
2
6
7
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
5
UNIT
ED
9th
Jan.
Dated this _____ day of ____________, 2018.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
H
9
10
LI
RT
8
FO
NO
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
___________________________________
Judg
THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
E
RN
A
4
S
3
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
15
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
ATTACHMENT A
TO ESI STIPULATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
STARTBATES – Indicates first page of a document
ENDBATES – Indicates the last page of a document
PARENTBATES – Indicates first page of PARENT
CUSTODIANS – Individual/Source(s) assigned to the record at collection time
EMAILTO
EMAILFROM
EMAILCC
EMAILBCC
EMAILSUBJECT
EMAILSENTDATETIME
EMAILAPPTSTARTDATETIME
FILENAME
FILECREATEDATETIME
FILELASTMODDATETIME
MD5HASH
TEXTLINK
NATIVELINK
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ESI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-07244-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?