Glaser et al v. Nationstar Mortgage

Filing 64

ORDER denying the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/5/2017. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 FRANKLIN GLASER, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A TRO v. 14 15 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 10, 11, 50 Defendants. 16 The plaintiffs in this mortgage-foreclosure case renewed their motion for a temporary 17 18 Case No. 16-cv-07245-LB restraining order.1 A temporary restraining order preserves the status quo and prevents irreparable harm until a 19 20 hearing can be held on a preliminary injunction application. See Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. 21 Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, 415 U.S. 423, 429 (1974). The standards for a 22 temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction are the same. See Stuhlbarg Int’l Sales 23 Co., Inc. v. John D. Brush & Co., Inc., 240 F.3d 832, 839 n.7 (9th Cir. 2001). A movant must 24 demonstrate (1) a likelihood of success on the merits, (2) a likelihood of irreparable harm that 25 would result if an injunction were not issued, (3) the balance of equities tips in favor of the 26 27 28 1 ECF Nos. 10, 11, 14, 50. ORDER — No. 16-cv-07245-LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?