Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc. v. Mata et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 Stipulation for Continuance of Case Management Conference and Stay. Case Management Statement due by 5/18/2017. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 5/25/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 17, 16th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/20/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2017)

Download PDF
1 Jeffrey L. Fillerup (SBN 120543) RINCON LAW LLP 2 90 New Montgomery St., Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94105 3 Tel. (415) 996-8199 Fax (415) 680-1712 4 E-mail: jfillerup@rinconlawllp.com 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff PESTMASTER FRANCHISE 6 NETWORK, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PESTMASTER FRANCHISE NETWORK, INC., a California 12 corporation, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 JINNY LYNN MATA, GABE 15 JOSEPH MATA, ECOSOURCE PEST CONTROL, INC., JOSIE 16 MOSS, BRIAN MOSS, AAAC SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC, aka A 17 ALL ANIMAL CONTROL, MOSS PEST CONTROL, LLC, 18 Defendants. 19 20 Case No. 16-cv-07268-EMC STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiff Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc., by and through its attorneys of 21 record, and Defendants Jinny Mata, Gabe Mata, Ecosource Pest Control, Inc., Josie 22 Moss, Brian Moss, AAAC Support Services, LLC, and Moss Pest Control, LLC, by 23 and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, as follows: 24 1 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, the Plaintiff is a franchisor of pest control businesses; 2 WHEREAS, Defendants Jinny Mata and Gabe Mata were the franchisees of 3 the Plaintiff and operated two Pestmaster franchise locations in the Houston, Texas 4 area; 5 WHEREAS, Defendant Ecosource Pest Control, Inc. is a Texas corporation, 6 owned by Jinny and Gabe Mata, and they contend the corporation owned the tangible 7 assets related to the Matas’ franchised business; 8 WHEREAS, Defendants Jinny Mata, Gabe Mata and Ecosource Pest Control, 9 Inc. are sometimes referred to as the “Mata Defendants”; 10 WHEREAS, the First Amended Complaint alleges that the Mata Defendants 11 breached the two franchise agreements by, among other things, terminating the two 12 franchises; 13 WHEREAS, the Mata Defendants deny that they have breached the franchise 14 agreements in any respect; 15 WHEREAS, the First Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants Josie Moss, 16 Brian Moss, and Moss Pest Control, LLC (collectively the “Moss Defendants”) and 17 Defendant AAAC Support Services, LLC (“AAAC”) conspired with the Mata 18 Defendants to breach the two franchise agreements with the Plaintiff; 19 WHEREAS, the Moss Defendants and AAAC deny the conspiracy and other 20 claims alleged against them in the First Amended Complaint; 21 WHEREAS, AAAC has filed a Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of 22 personal jurisdiction and for improper venue and a motion to change venue, the 23 motions were heard on March 23, 2017, and a decision on the motions is pending; 24 2 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 WHEREAS, Josie Moss, Brian Moss and Moss Pest Control, LLC intend to 2 file similar Rule 12(b)(2) motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for 3 improper venue and a motion to change venue; 4 WHEREAS, both the Moss Defendants and AAAC deny that this Court has 5 personal jurisdiction and further contend that venue is improper as to each of them in 6 this case, and they do not waive such jurisdictional and venue objections by entering 7 into this stipulation, and file this stipulation subject thereto; 8 WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants are 9 currently discussing the potential for settlement of all of the claims among all of the 10 parties in the case; 11 WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants are also 12 discussing other ADR options, such as the referral of all or some of the claims at 13 issue in the First Amended Complaint, against some of the Defendants, to the 14 American Arbitration Association for binding arbitration; and 15 WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate to the 16 Court’s entry of an order providing as follows:. 17 1. That the Case Management Conference currently set for April 24, 2017 18 at 9:30 a.m. be continued to May 18, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. 19 2. That the date for the Mata Defendants and the Moss Defendants to file a 20 responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint be continued to May 18, 2017. 21 3. That the case be stayed until the May 18, 2017 Case Management 22 Conference, during which time the parties will have additional time to attempt to 23 reach a stipulation regarding (i) a global mediation involving all of the claims and all 24 3 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 of the parties in this case, or (ii) the reference of all or some of the claims at issue to 2 binding arbitration at AAA. 3 4. AAAC and the Moss Defendants do not waive their personal jurisdiction 4 and venue objections by entering into this stipulation. 5 6 DATED: April 18, 2017 RINCON LAW LLP 7 By: 8 9 /s/Jeffrey L. Fillerup Jeffrey L. Fillerup Attorneys for Plaintiff Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc. 10 11 DATED: April 18, 2017 12 NASSIRI & JUNG LLP By: 13 14 15 16 /s/Andrew R. Kislik Andrew R. Kislik Attorneys for Defendants Jinny Lynn Mata, Gabe Joseph Mata, Ecosource Pest Control, Inc., Josie Moss, Brian Moss, Moss Pest Control, LLC, and AAAC Support Services, LLC 17 ORDER 18 19 Based on the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause appearing, IT IS 20 HEREBY ORDERED, as follows: 21 1. The Case Management Conference currently set for April 24, 2017 is 25 22 taken off calendar, and the Case Management Conference is re-scheduled to May 18, 23 2017 at 9:30 a.m. 24 4 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2. The date for the Mata Defendants and the Moss Defendants to file a 2 responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint (including any Rule 12(b) 25 3 motion) is continued to May 18, 2017. 4 3. The case is stayed until the May 18, 2017 Case Management Conference, 5 during which time the parties will have additional time to try to stipulate to: (i) a 6 global mediation involving all of the claims and all of the parties in this case and/or 7 (ii) the reference of all or some of the claims, against some of the parties, at issue in 8 the case to binding arbitration at AAA. 9 4. AAAC and the Moss Defendants do not waive their personal jurisdiction 10 and venue objections by entering into this stipulation regarding a possible mediation 11 and/or arbitration. UNIT ED HON. EDWARDDERCHEN M. ED O OR DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATESIED IT IS S DIF 15 . Chen ward M udge Ed ER LI J A H 18 RT 17 NO 16 R NIA AS MO FO 14 4/20/17 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 13 DATED: S 12 N F D IS T IC T O R C 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?