Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc. v. Mata et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 Stipulation for Continuance of Case Management Conference and Stay. Case Management Statement due by 5/18/2017. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 5/25/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 17, 16th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/20/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2017)
1 Jeffrey L. Fillerup (SBN 120543)
RINCON LAW LLP
2 90 New Montgomery St., Suite 1400
San Francisco, CA 94105
3 Tel. (415) 996-8199
Fax (415) 680-1712
4 E-mail: jfillerup@rinconlawllp.com
5 Attorneys for Plaintiff
PESTMASTER FRANCHISE
6 NETWORK, INC.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 PESTMASTER FRANCHISE
NETWORK, INC., a California
12 corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
JINNY LYNN MATA, GABE
15 JOSEPH MATA, ECOSOURCE
PEST CONTROL, INC., JOSIE
16 MOSS, BRIAN MOSS, AAAC
SUPPORT SERVICES, LLC, aka A
17 ALL ANIMAL CONTROL, MOSS
PEST CONTROL, LLC,
18
Defendants.
19
20
Case No. 16-cv-07268-EMC
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE
OF CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE AND STAY, AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff Pestmaster Franchise Network, Inc., by and through its attorneys of
21 record, and Defendants Jinny Mata, Gabe Mata, Ecosource Pest Control, Inc., Josie
22 Moss, Brian Moss, AAAC Support Services, LLC, and Moss Pest Control, LLC, by
23 and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate, as follows:
24
1
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
WHEREAS, the Plaintiff is a franchisor of pest control businesses;
2
WHEREAS, Defendants Jinny Mata and Gabe Mata were the franchisees of
3 the Plaintiff and operated two Pestmaster franchise locations in the Houston, Texas
4 area;
5
WHEREAS, Defendant Ecosource Pest Control, Inc. is a Texas corporation,
6 owned by Jinny and Gabe Mata, and they contend the corporation owned the tangible
7 assets related to the Matas’ franchised business;
8
WHEREAS, Defendants Jinny Mata, Gabe Mata and Ecosource Pest Control,
9 Inc. are sometimes referred to as the “Mata Defendants”;
10
WHEREAS, the First Amended Complaint alleges that the Mata Defendants
11 breached the two franchise agreements by, among other things, terminating the two
12 franchises;
13
WHEREAS, the Mata Defendants deny that they have breached the franchise
14 agreements in any respect;
15
WHEREAS, the First Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants Josie Moss,
16 Brian Moss, and Moss Pest Control, LLC (collectively the “Moss Defendants”) and
17 Defendant AAAC Support Services, LLC (“AAAC”) conspired with the Mata
18 Defendants to breach the two franchise agreements with the Plaintiff;
19
WHEREAS, the Moss Defendants and AAAC deny the conspiracy and other
20 claims alleged against them in the First Amended Complaint;
21
WHEREAS, AAAC has filed a Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of
22 personal jurisdiction and for improper venue and a motion to change venue, the
23 motions were heard on March 23, 2017, and a decision on the motions is pending;
24
2
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
WHEREAS, Josie Moss, Brian Moss and Moss Pest Control, LLC intend to
2 file similar Rule 12(b)(2) motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for
3 improper venue and a motion to change venue;
4
WHEREAS, both the Moss Defendants and AAAC deny that this Court has
5 personal jurisdiction and further contend that venue is improper as to each of them in
6 this case, and they do not waive such jurisdictional and venue objections by entering
7 into this stipulation, and file this stipulation subject thereto;
8
WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants are
9 currently discussing the potential for settlement of all of the claims among all of the
10 parties in the case;
11
WHEREAS, counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for the Defendants are also
12 discussing other ADR options, such as the referral of all or some of the claims at
13 issue in the First Amended Complaint, against some of the Defendants,
to the
14 American Arbitration Association for binding arbitration; and
15
WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the parties hereby stipulate to the
16 Court’s entry of an order providing as follows:.
17
1.
That the Case Management Conference currently set for April 24, 2017
18 at 9:30 a.m. be continued to May 18, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.
19
2.
That the date for the Mata Defendants and the Moss Defendants to file a
20 responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint be continued to May 18, 2017.
21
3.
That the case be stayed until the May 18, 2017 Case Management
22 Conference, during which time the parties will have additional time to attempt to
23 reach a stipulation regarding (i) a global mediation involving all of the claims and all
24
3
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 of the parties in this case, or (ii) the reference of all or some of the claims at issue to
2 binding arbitration at AAA.
3
4.
AAAC and the Moss Defendants do not waive their personal jurisdiction
4 and venue objections by entering into this stipulation.
5
6 DATED: April 18, 2017
RINCON LAW LLP
7
By:
8
9
/s/Jeffrey L. Fillerup
Jeffrey L. Fillerup
Attorneys for Plaintiff Pestmaster Franchise
Network, Inc.
10
11
DATED: April 18, 2017
12
NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
By:
13
14
15
16
/s/Andrew R. Kislik
Andrew R. Kislik
Attorneys for Defendants Jinny Lynn Mata,
Gabe Joseph Mata, Ecosource Pest Control,
Inc., Josie Moss, Brian Moss, Moss Pest
Control, LLC, and AAAC Support Services,
LLC
17
ORDER
18
19
Based on the foregoing stipulation, and for good cause appearing, IT IS
20 HEREBY ORDERED, as follows:
21
1.
The Case Management Conference currently set for April 24, 2017 is
25
22 taken off calendar, and the Case Management Conference is re-scheduled to May 18,
23 2017 at 9:30 a.m.
24
4
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2.
The date for the Mata Defendants and the Moss Defendants to file a
2 responsive pleading to the First Amended Complaint (including any Rule 12(b)
25
3 motion) is continued to May 18, 2017.
4
3.
The case is stayed until the May 18, 2017 Case Management Conference,
5 during which time the parties will have additional time to try to stipulate to: (i) a
6 global mediation involving all of the claims and all of the parties in this case and/or
7 (ii) the reference of all or some of the claims, against some of the parties, at issue in
8 the case to binding arbitration at AAA.
9
4.
AAAC and the Moss Defendants do not waive their personal jurisdiction
10 and venue objections by entering into this stipulation regarding a possible mediation
11 and/or arbitration.
UNIT
ED
HON. EDWARDDERCHEN
M. ED
O OR DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATESIED
IT IS S
DIF
15
. Chen
ward M
udge Ed
ER
LI
J
A
H
18
RT
17
NO
16
R NIA
AS MO
FO
14
4/20/17
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
13 DATED:
S
12
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
19
20
21
22
23
24
5
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND
STAY, AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?