Leedy v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 31 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company filed by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 22, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Donald Max Leedy CASE No C 3:16-cv-07269-JST Plaintiff(s) v. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, et al Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) ■ Private ADR (specify process and provider) Private Mediation - Mediator TBD, parties meeting and conferring Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: December 15, 2017 Date: March 22, 2017 Date: March 22, 2017 /s/ Timothy Clark Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Donald F. Zimmer, Jr. Attorney for Defendant  IT IS SO ORDERED IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: March 22, 2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?