Bishop et al v. Cordis Corporation
Filing
18
ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES (granting 17 motion) by Hon. William Alsup. Status Report due by 7/6/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2017)
<![CDATA[
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AUDREY BISHOP, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
CORDIS CORPORATION,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 16-07272 WHA
The Court has considered defendant’s unopposed motion to continue case management
17
deadlines (Dkt. No. 17). The case management conference in this matter is continued from
18
April 6 to the FOURTH THURSDAY after our court of appeals decides Dunson v. Cordis, Case
19
No. 17-15257. The case management statement is due SEVEN DAYS before the case
20
management conference. Defendants shall answer or otherwise respond to the complaint under
21
FRCP 12 at least FOURTEEN DAYS before the case management conference.
22
23
If Dunson has not been decided by JULY 6, then by NOON on that date, both sides shall
submit a joint status report on the progress of the appeal.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
Dated: March 22, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
