Bishop et al v. Cordis Corporation

Filing 21

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Alsup on 5/5/2017. Show Cause Response due by 6/1/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AUDREY BISHOP, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

No. C 16-07272 WHA

Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
CORDIS CORPORATION,
Defendant.
/

15
16

The parties previously informed the Court that defendant Cordis Corporation removed

17

this action, “along with other cases asserting the claims of more than 200 plaintiffs, under the

18

‘mass action’ provision of the Class Action Fairness Act”; that Judge Edward Chen had issued

19

an order remanding many such cases; that Cordis had appealed that order; and that “[t]he same

20

jurisdictional issues raised in this appeal are at issue in the above-captioned matter” (Dkt. No.

21

12 at 1–2). Cordis recently filed notice that our court of appeals affirmed Judge Chen’s order

22

on April 14 and Cordis petitioned for rehearing en banc on April 28. Hollins v. Cordis Corp.,

23

No. 3:16-cv-06740-WHA (Dkt. No. 19).

24

By JUNE 1 AT NOON, Cordis shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why this action should not be

25

remanded for the same reasons set forth in Judge Chen’s order affirmed by our court of appeals.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: May 5, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE