Stocks v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 for Dismissal With Prejudice filed by AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/17/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 LAW OFFICE OF P. RANDALL NOAH P. RANDALL NOAH (State Bar No. 136452) 21 Orinda Way, Suite C, #316 Orinda, California 94563 Telephone: (925) 253-5540 Facsimile: (925) 253-5542 E-Mail: pnoah@ix.netcome.com Attorney for Plaintiff DONALD STOCKS KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP SUSAN W. Pangborn (State Bar No. 282533) JAMES SMITH (State Bar No. 190050) KENDRA CHAPMAN (State Bar No. 294030) Two Embarcadero Center, Suite 1900 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 576-0200 Facsimile: (415) 576-0300 E-Mail: spangborn@kilpatricktownsend.com james.smith@kilpatricktownsend.com kchapman@kilpatricktownsend.com Attorneys for Defendant AT&T SERVICES, INC. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 DONALD STOCKS, Plaintiff, 20 21 22 23 24 v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1, Defendant. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-07392-EMC Case No. 16-cv-07392-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Honorable Edward M. Chen Complaint filed December 29, 2016 1 2 3 4 5 Plaintiff Donald Stocks and Defendant AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 hereby stipulate and agree as follows: This action shall be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. IT IS SO STIPULATED, through counsel of record. 6 7 Dated: November 10, 2017 LAW OFFICES OF P. RANDALL NOAH 8 9 By: 10 /s/ P. Randall Noah P. Randall Noah Attorney for Plaintiff DONALD STOCKS 11 12 13 Dated: November 10, 2017 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 14 15 By: 16 /s/ Susan W. Pangborn Susan W. Pangborn Attorney for Defendant AT&T SERVICES, INC. 17 18 19 20 ATTESTATION REGARDING SIGNATURE 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of 22 perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory. 23 Dated: November 10, 2017 24 /s/ Susan W. Pangborn Susan W. Pangborn 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-07392-EMC -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 4 in its entirety, with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 UNIT ED 7 8 9 DERED O OR IT IS S Edward M. Chen United States District Judge . Chen dward M Judge E RT 13576492V.1 FO NO 10 11 S DISTRICT TE C TA ER 13 A H 12 RT U O S 6 11/17/17 Dated: _________________________ R NIA 3 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action shall be dismissed LI 2 N D IS T IC T R OF C 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 16-cv-07392-EMC -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?