The Regents of the University of California v. Chen et al

Filing 42

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 41 RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS filed by The Regents of the University of California. Motion Hearing set for 4/27/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/7/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Stuart C. Plunkett (SBN: 187971) stuart.plunkett@bakerbotts.com Ariel D. House (SBN: 280477) ariel.house@bakerbotts.com BAKER BOTTS LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3600 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 291-6200 Facsimile: (415) 291-6300 Robert J. Gunther, Jr. (N.Y. SBN: 1967652) robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 937-7518 Facsimile: (212) 230-8888 Paul R. Morico (pro hac vice) paul.morico@bakerbotts.com BAKER BOTTS LLP One Shell Plaza 901 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 229-1234 Facsimile: (713) 229-1522 Counsel for Defendants Counsel for Plaintiff 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF 17 CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 v. 20 ROGER JINTEH ARRIGO CHEN, an individual; GENIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware 21 corporation; and DOES 1-25, 22 Case No. 3:16-cv-07396 RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS [L.R. 6-2] Judge Edward M. Chen Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 3:16-cv-07396 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff the Regents of the University of California 1 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Roger Jinteh Arrigo Chen and Genia Technologies, Inc. 3 (collectively, “Defendants”) (collectively, Plaintiff and Defendants shall be referred to herein as 4 the “Parties”) hereby file this Renewed Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time on Briefing 5 Schedule for Motion to Dismiss, as follows: 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this action on December 29, 2016; 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to the deadline set forth in a stipulation regarding service and 8 response date filed with the Court on January 10, 2017, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on 9 February 27, 2017; WHEREAS, Defendants noticed the motion to dismiss for hearing before Judge William 10 11 H. Orrick on April 26, 2017; WHEREAS, Judge Orrick subsequently recused himself from the case, and the case was 12 13 reassigned to this Court; WHEREAS, Defendants have re-noticed the motion to dismiss for hearing on April 27, 14 15 2017; WHEREAS, the parties - in exchange for agreeing on service issues and an extended time 16 17 for Defendants to respond to the Complaint - agreed to a briefing schedule on any motion to 18 dismiss that would give Plaintiff additional time to file an opposition; WHEREAS, the parties met and conferred and agreed to a briefing schedule in which 19 20 briefing will be complete at least two weeks prior to the noticed hearing date; WHEREAS, the parties filed a stipulation regarding briefing schedule before the case 21 22 was reassigned to this Court, and now wish to submit this renewed stipulation; 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS -1- Case No. 3:16-cv-07396 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, that Plaintiff shall file its opposition to 2 the motion to dismiss no later than March 24, 2017, and Defendants shall file their reply brief no 3 later than April 12, 2017. 4 BAKER BOTTS LLP WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP /s/ Stuart C. Plunkett Stuart C. Plunkett (State Bar No. 187971) stuart.plunkett@bakerbotts.com Ariel D. House (SBN: 280477) ariel.house@bakerbotts.com BAKER BOTTS LLP 101 California Street, Suite 3070 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 291-6200 Facsimile: (415) 291-6300 /s/ Robert J. Gunther Robert J. Gunther, Jr. robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR 7 World Trade Center 250 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10007 Telephone: (212) 937-7518 Facsimile: (212) 230-8888 Paul R. Morico (pro hac vice) paul.morico@bakerbotts.com BAKER BOTTS LLP One Shell Plaza 901 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 229-1234 Facsimile: (713) 229-1522 Counsel for Defendants 5 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, Motion hearing reset for 4/27/17 at 1:30 p.m. S DISTRICT Dated: 3/7/2017 _____________________________________ TE C HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN TA United States District Judge RT U O 21 Counsel for Plaintiff 22 23 RT 25 dwar Judge E ER H 26 en d M. Ch NO 24 D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF AS MO R NIA 11 27 FO 10 LI 9 A 8 S 7 UNIT ED 6 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS -2- Case No. 3:16-cv-07396 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 1 2 3 4 I, Stuart C. Plunkett, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civil. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories. 5 6 7 March 6, 2017 By: /s/ Stuart C. Plunkett Stuart C. Plunkett 8 9 10 11 12 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 6, 2017, I electronically filed the above document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing to all registered counsel. 14 15 March 6, 2017 By: /s/ Stuart C. Plunkett Stuart C. Plunkett 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RENEWED STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO DISMISS -3- Case No. 3:16-cv-07396

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?