The Regents of the University of California v. Chen et al

Filing 57

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR, STIPULATION AND ORDER re 52 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Roger Jinteh Arrigo Chen, Genia Technologies, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California filed by Genia Technologies, Inc., Roger Jinteh Arrigo Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/18/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2017)

1

[Counsel Provided on Signature Pages]

2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11
12

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16
17

v.
ROGER JINTEH ARRIGO CHEN, an individual;
GENIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1-25,
Defendants.

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR
PROCESS
Presiding: Hon. Edward M. Chen
Date: June 8, 2017
Time: 1:30 PM
Location: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
Case Reassigned: March 1, 2017

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the

2

following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

3

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

4

□

Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)

5

□

Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

6

(Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an

7

early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for

8

ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

9
10

X

Private ADR (please identify process and provider): to be determined.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

11

□

12

order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

13

X

14

parties after a ruling on the dispositive motions due to be fully briefed on May

15

22, 2017.

16

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the

other requested deadline: at an appropriate time to be agreed upon by the

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1
2

Dated: April 14, 2017.

3
4

BAKER BOTTS LLP

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP

/s/ Stuart C. Plunkett
Stuart C. Plunkett (State Bar No. 187971)
[e-mail]
Ariel D. House (State Bar No. 280477)
[e-mail]
BAKER BOTTS LLP
101 California Street, Suite 3070
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

/s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr.
Robert J. Gunther, Jr. (NY SBN: 1967652)
[e-mail]
Omar Khan (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Paul R. Morico (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Elizabeth Durham Flannery (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Thomas P. Rooney (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
BAKER BOTTS LLP
One Shell Plaza
901 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff The Regents of the
University of California

22
23
24

Sarah B. Petty (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 617-526-5000
Nora Q.E. Passamaneck (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
1225 17th Street, Suite 2600
Denver, CO 80202

25
26
27
28

Robert M. Galvin (State Bar No. 171508)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE
AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650-858-6100

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

3

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 720-274-3133

1
2

Counsel for Defendants Roger Jinteh Arrigo
Chen and Genia Technologies, Inc.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS

1

ATTORNEY ATTESTATION

2
3
4
5

I, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civil. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the
concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

6
7

April 14, 2017

By:

8

/s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr. _______________
Robert J. Gunther, Jr.

9
10

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

11
I, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., hereby certify that on April 14, 2017, I electronically filed the
12
13
14

above document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic
notification of such filing to all registered counsel.

15
16

April 14, 2017

By:

/s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr. _______________
Robert J. Gunther, Jr.

5

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

3

Non-binding Arbitration

4

□ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)

5

□ Mediation

6

X Private ADR

7

Deadline for ADR session

8

□ 90 days from the date of this order.

9

X other: at an appropriate time to be determined after a ruling on the

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

S

16

NO

ER

H

18
19

OR

HON. EDWARD M. CHEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

RT

17

O
IT IS S

R NIA

15

________________________________
DERED

FO

4/18/17
DATED_______________

UNIT
ED

14

RT
U
O

13

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

11

dispositive motions due to be fully briefed on May 22, 2017.

A

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
SELECTING ADR PROCESS