The Regents of the University of California v. Chen et al
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 69 To Extend Deadline For Defendants To File Answers To Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, filed by Genia Technologies, Inc., Roger Jinteh Arrigo Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/25/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2017)
1
[Counsel Provided on Signature Pages]
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA, a California corporation,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
ROGER JINTEH ARRIGO CHEN, an individual;
14 GENIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1-25,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396-EMC
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND
THE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS
TO FILE ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2(a), Plaintiff The Regents of the University of California
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Roger Chen and Genia Technologies, Inc. (collectively,
“Defendants”) (collectively together, the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and request as follows:
WHEREAS the Parties have been engaged in settlement discussions since the Court’s
hearing on June 8, 2017;
WHEREAS, in light of those settlement discussions, the Parties agreed to extend the deadline
for Defendants’ Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint from August 9, 2017, to
August 30, 2017;
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396
28
ActiveUS 164623769v.1
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT
1
WHEREAS, on August 10, 2017, the Court entered an Order granting this extension;
2
WHEREAS the Parties are still engaged in settlement discussions and believe that a further
3
4
extension will benefit those discussions; and
WHEREAS this extension is not made for purposes of delay, but so that justice may be done;
5
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Parties respectfully request that the
time for Defendants to file answers to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint be extended to and
including September 15, 2017.
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 25, 2017.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
BAKER BOTTS LLP
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
/s/ Stuart C. Plunkett
Stuart C. Plunkett (State Bar No. 187971)
stuart.plunkett@bakerbotts.com
Ariel D. House (State Bar No. 280477)
ariel.house@bakerbotts.com
BAKER BOTTS LLP
101 California Street, Suite 3070
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 291-6200
Facsimile: (415) 291-6300
/s/ Robert J. Gunther, Jr.
Robert J. Gunther, Jr. (NY SBN: 1967652)
robert.gunther@wilmerhale.com
Omar Khan (pro hac vice)
omar.khan@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR LLP
7 World Trade Center
250 Greenwich Street
New York, NY 10007
Telephone: (212) 230-8800
Facsimile: (212) 230-8888
Paul R. Morico (pro hac vice)
paul.morico@bakerbotts.com
Elizabeth Durham Flannery (pro hac vice)
liz.durham@bakerbotts.com
Thomas P. Rooney (pro hac vice)
thomas.rooney@bakerbotts.com
BAKER BOTTS LLP
One Shell Plaza
901 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396
28
ACTIVEUS 164623769V.1
Robert M. Galvin (State Bar No. 171508)
robert.galvin@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: 650-858-6000
Facsimile: 650-858-6100
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
2
3
Telephone: (713) 229-1234
Facsimile: (713) 229-1522
Counsel for Plaintiff The Regents of the
University of California
4
5
6
Sarah B. Petty (pro hac vice)
sarah.petty@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: 617-526-6000
Facsimile: 617-526-5000
Nora Q.E. Passamaneck (pro hac vice)
nora.passamaneck@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
DORR LLP
1225 17th Street, Suite 2600
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: 720-274-3135
Facsimile: 720-274-3133
7
8
9
10
11
Counsel for Defendants Roger Jinteh Arrigo
Chen and Genia Technologies, Inc.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396
28
ACTIVEUS 164623769V.1
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
1
2
3
4
I, Robert J. Gunther, Jr., am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
this Stipulation. In compliance with N.D. Cal. Civil. L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the
concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
5
6
7
August 25, 2017
By: _ /s/_Robert J. Gunther, Jr._______________
Robert J. Gunther, Jr.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on August 25, 2017, I electronically filed the above document with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filing to all
registered counsel.
15
16
August 25, 2017
17
By: _ /s/_Robert J. Gunther, Jr._______________
Robert J. Gunther, Jr.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396
28
ACTIVEUS 164623769V.1
4
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED that the time for Defendants to file
3
4
answers to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint is extended to and including September 15,
5
2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
RT
11
ER
13
A
H
12
R NIA
NO
10
DERED
SO OR M. CHEN
IT EDWARD
HON. IS
FO
9
________________________________
LI
8
UNIT
ED
8/25/17
DATED_______________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
7
S
6
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 3:16-cv-07396
28
ACTIVEUS 164623769V.1
5
JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE
ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?