In the Matter of Stuart Mitchell Silman - #112065

Filing 2

ORDER OF SUSPENSION re 1 Order to Show Cause,. Signed by Judge James Donato on 3/31/16. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN THE MATTER OF 8 Case No. 16-mc-80032-JD Stuart Mitchell Silman #112065 ORDER OF SUSPENSION 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Because Stuart Mitchell Silman has failed to respond to the Order to Show Cause, Mr. Silman's membership in the bar of this Court is hereby suspended. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2016 ______________________________________ JAMES DONATO United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 Case No. 16-mc-80032-JD IN THE MATTER OF Stuart Mitchell Silman #112065 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on 3/31/2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 14 15 16 Stuart Mitchell Silman 1327 Lincoln Avenue #213 San Rafael, CA 94901 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Dated: 3/31/2016 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court By: __________________________ Lisa R. Clark, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable James Donato 25 26 27 28 2 United States District Court Northern District of California 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?