Missud v. Shapero et al

Filing 2

ORDER OF REFERRAL OF REQUEST FOR RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Alsup on 9/2/16. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/2/2016)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11

No. C 12-03117 WHA
No. 13-mc-80263 WHA
No. 16-mc-80140 WHA

PATRICK MISSUD,

v.

12
13

ORDER OF REFERRAL OF
REQUEST FOR RECUSAL

SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT,
et al.,
Defendant.

14

/

15
16

PATRICK MISSUD,
Plaintiff,

17
18

v.

19

SAN FRANCISCO SUPERIOR COURT,
et al.,

20

Defendant.

21

/

22
23

PATRICK A. MISSUD,

24

Plaintiff,

25
26
27
28

v.
KENNETH SHAPERO; WILLIAM
ELFVING; DEBORAH RYAN LAURIE
SMITH; BENJAMIN BREIT; MARIO
PEREZ; JEFFREY ROSEN; CHRIS
BOSCIA; LISA SCHON; CAROLYN
MALINSKY; JENNIFER BEDOLLA;
TERRANCE RILEY; ASHLEY COHEN;

1

JOHN GREENE; DOUG JOHNSON;
DOES 1–1000,

2
Defendants.
/

3
4

In 2012, Attorney Patrick Missud was declared a vexatious litigant. Missud v. San
5
Francisco Superior Court, No. 12-cv-3117, 2012 U.S. Dist. Lexis 137351, at *9–*10 (N.D. Cal.
6
Sept. 24, 2012). In 2013, the vexatious litigant order was expanded to make all of Missud’s
7
filings in this district subject to pre-filing review by the undersigned judge. Missud v. National
8
Rifle Association, No 13-mc-80263, Dkt. No. 4 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2013). In July 2013, he was
9
placed on involuntary inactive status with the State Bar of California. The State Bar decision
10
Matter of Patrick Alexandre Missud, No. 12-O-10026-LMA (Cal. St. B. July 1, 2013).
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

states that Missud “has total disdain for the legal profession and the judicial process.” In the
11
12
Attorney Missud has filed a new complaint along with a motion with an “Affidavit of 613
Year Federal Informant Patrick Missud” that seeks recusal of the undersigned judge from
14
conducting the pre-filing review procedure pursuant to the orders in Case Nos. 12-3117 and
15
13-mc-80263. Attorney Missud’s motion is hereby REFERRED to for random assignment to
16
another judge to determine whether the undersigned must recuse himself from conducting pre17
filing review.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21
Dated: September 2, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2