Missud v. Shapero et al

Filing 6

ORDER RE PRE-FILING REVIEW OF COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Alsup on 12/12/2016. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2016)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 16-80140 WHA

PATRICK A. MISSUD,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16

v.

ORDER RE PRE-FILING
REVIEW OF COMPLAINT

KENNETH SHAPERO, et al.,
Defendants.
/

17
18

Plaintiff Patrick Missud, a vexatious litigant, filed a new complaint and motion to recuse

19

the undersigned from conducting pre-filing review of the complaint (Dkt. No. 1). The motion

20

was randomly assigned to Judge Edward Chen, prompting further objection from plaintiff (Dkt.

21

Nos. 2–4). After considering said objection, Judge Chen denied the motion (Dkt. No. 5).

22

The undersigned has reviewed plaintiff’s complaint and finds it is frivolous, like so

23

many of plaintiff’s other filings in this district. See, e.g., In re Patrick A. Missud, No.

24

3:16-mc-80114-WHA (Dkt. No. 3); Missud v. State Bar of Cal., No. 3:16-mc-80020-WHA

25

(Dkt. No. 3); Missud v. Cty. of Santa Clara, No. 3:15-mc-80247-WHA (Dkt. No. 3); Missud v.

26

Elfving, No. 3:15-mc-80227-WHA (Dkt. Nos. 2–3); Missud v. State of Cal., No.

27

3:14-mc-80039-WHA (Dkt. No. 3); Missud v. Nat’l Rifle Ass’n, No. 3:13-mc-80263-WHA

28

(Dkt. No. 6); Missud v. Superior Court, No. 3:12-cv-03117-WHA (Dkt. Nos. 181–82).

1

Accordingly, the Clerk is ordered not to accept the proposed complaint for filing, and this

2

action is DISMISSED.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6

Dated: December 12, 2016.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2