Federal Trade Commission v. D-Link Corporation et al

Filing 3

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Federal Trade Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit Redacted Complaint, # 4 Exhibit Unredacted Complaint, # 5 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Tully, Cathlin) (Filed on 1/5/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

LAURA D. BERGER (FL Bar No. 11762)
Federal Trade Commission
901 Market Street, Suite 570
San Francisco, CA 94103
P: [phone]/F: [phone]
[e-mail];
KEVIN H. MORIARTY (DC Bar No. 975904)
CATHLIN TULLY (NY Bar)
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Ave N.W.
Washington, DC 20580
P: [phone]/F: [phone]
[e-mail]; [e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
____________________________________
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
D-LINK CORPORATION
)
)
and
)
)
D-LINK SYSTEMS, INC.,
)
corporations,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )

Case No. 3:17-cv-00039

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE FEDERAL
TRADE COMMISSION’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FTC’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
PAGE 1
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00039

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

On January 5, 2017, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission (“FTC) filed, pursuant to Civil
Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d) and (e), an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal
(“Administrative Motion”) portions of Plaintiff’s Complaint.
The FTC’s complaint alleges facts in Paragraphs 10, 11, and 25 that the FTC obtained
during the course of its non-public investigation of D-Link Systems, Inc. (“DLS”). In providing
this information to the FTC, DLS designated this information as confidential pursuant to Section
21 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. § 57b-2.
Having considered the FTC’s Administrative Motion, the Declaration of Cathlin Tully in
Support of the Administrative Motion, and any declaration submitted by DLS in response
thereto, pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11, 79-5(d) and (e), and good cause appearing therefore:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Administrative Motion is:
[ ] GRANTED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
[ ] DENIED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
[ ] GRANTED/DENIED IN PART.

15
16
17
18

DATED: __________________

________________________
.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FTC’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
PAGE 2
CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00039