Fitbit, Inc. v. Laguna 2, LLC et al

Filing 109

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 108 Joint Stipulated Request and Proposed Order to Briefly Extend Deadline For Settlement Conference filed by Fitbit, Inc. Status Report due by 11/14/2017. Status Conference reset from 11/9/2017 to 11/21/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/8/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2017)

Download PDF
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES JASON R. BARTLETT (State Bar No. 214530) jbartlett@mkwllp.com MARC J. PERNICK (State Bar No. 160591) mpernick@mkwllp.com MAURIEL KAPOUYTIAN WOODS LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 480 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 415-738-6228 Facsimile: 415-738-2315 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff FITBIT, INC. 7 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 1 JEFFREY C. HALLAM (State Bar No. 161259) E-Mail: jhallam@sideman.com 2 ZACHARY J. ALINDER (State Bar No. 209009) E-Mail: zalinder@sideman.com 3 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP One Embarcadero Center, Twenty-Second Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111-3711 Telephone: (415) 392-1960 (415) 392-0827 5 Facsimile: SHERMAN W. KAHN (State Bar No. 168924) skahn@mkwllp.com 15 W. 26th Street, 7th Floor New York, NY 10010 Telephone: 212-529-5131 Facsimile: 212-5295132 8 Stephen M. Lobbin (SBN 181195) slobbin@onellp.com 9 ONE LLP 4000 MacArthur Boulevard 10 East Tower, Suite 500 Newport Beach, California 92660 11 Tel: 949.502.2870 Fax: 949.258.5081 12 Attorneys for Defendants 13 Cali Resources, Inc., Carlos Kelvin, and Great Value LLC 14 Attorneys for Defendants LAGUNA 2, LLC, and JOEL BLANK 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 FITBIT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 v. 20 LAGUNA 2, LLC, et al., Defendants. 21 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079 EMC (EDL) JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO BRIEFLY EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 61(B) AND 6-2 and resetting status conference 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3359801 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (EDL) JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE Pursuant to Civil L.R. Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2 and the Court’s Case Management Order, Dkt. 1 2 No. 86, Plaintiff Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”) and Defendants Cali Resources, Inc., Carlos Kelvin, and 3 Great Value, LLC (together “Cali”), as well as Defendants Laguna 2, LLC and Joel Blank 4 (together “L2,” and collectively with Cali and Fitbit, the “Parties”) hereby respectfully submit the 5 following joint stipulated request and proposed order, requesting that the Court briefly extend the 6 deadline for the Parties to hold the settlement conference for good cause set forth in more detail 7 below. The Parties have also concurrently filed the Declaration of Zachary Alinder in Support of 8 this Stipulation and Proposed Order (“Alinder Decl.), as required by Civ. L.R. 6-2(a). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT RE STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION Through this joint stipulated request, pursuant to Civ. L.R. Rule 6-1(b) and 6-2, the Parties 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 I. 11 respectfully request that the Court briefly extend the deadline for the Parties to complete a 12 settlement conference to November 8, 2017. For the reasons set forth below, the Parties stipulate 13 that this brief extension would enable the Parties to schedule a later conference, in which all 14 defendants can participate, but which will still conclude before the next case management 15 conference scheduled before the Court on November 9. In addition, the Parties have not 16 previously requested any extension of the deadline to complete the settlement conference in this 17 Action. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and respectfully submit that good cause exists here for 18 the requested extension because it would further the goals of the Court’s ADR processes and also 19 help conserve the resources and time of the Court and the Parties, while still preserving the 20 broader case management schedule set by the Court in its Case Management Order, Dkt. No. 86. 21 II. RELEVANT BACKGROUND 22 On June 8, 2017, the Court held a case management conference in the above captioned 23 case. (Dkt. No. 85.) In the Case Management Order issued following the conference, the Court 24 set a deadline of October 13, 2017 to complete a settlement conference and set a further status 25 conference for November 9, 2017. (Dkt. No. 86.) 26 Subsequently Magistrate Judge Laporte issued an order setting a settlement conference for 27 September 20, 2017. (Dkt. No 89.) 28 9461-10\3359801 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (EDL) 1 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE On July 21, 2017, Fitbit filed a Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. No. 92.) The Second 1 2 Amended Complaint added eleven new defendants to the suit. On August 21, 2017, Defendants 3 L2 and Cali moved to dismiss. (Dkt. Nos. 99, 101.) The hearing on those motions is currently 4 scheduled for September 28, 2017, which is eight days after the currently scheduled settlement 5 conference. While Fitbit has served new defendants, they have not yet appeared or responded to the 6 7 Second Amended Complaint. (Dkt. Nos. 102-06.) It is unclear if they intend to participate in the 8 settlement conference currently scheduled for September 20, 2017. GOOD CAUSE EXISTS FOR THE COURT TO BRIEFLY EXTEND THE 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 III. DEADLINE TO HOLD THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 11 L2 and Fitbit have previously attended two settlement conferences related to this dispute, 12 which were conducted in the District of New Jersey. Cali was represented and participated in the 13 second conference. Based on that experience, the Parties have conferred and agree that the next 14 settlement conference is substantially more likely to be fruitful if conducted after: (1) the hearing 15 on Defendants’ pending motions to dismiss (set for September 28, 2017), and (2) the remaining 16 Defendants have appeared and confirm they can participate. 17 However, the Parties have met and conferred and have been unable to identify a suitable 18 date before the October 13, 2017 deadline that is available to Judge Laporte and to all Parties. In 19 addition, due to a trial scheduled in late October and other commitments, Cali is unavailable to 20 conduct a settlement conference during the weeks of October 9, 16, and 23. Finally, it is unclear 21 whether the newly-added Defendants are available for, and would appear, in any event for the 22 currently-scheduled September 20, 2017 settlement conference date, since they have not appeared 23 in the case at this point. In addition, the Parties have submitted a declaration in support, setting 24 forth the items required by Civil L.R. 6-2(a)(1)-(3), by concurrently filing the Alinder Decl. 25 Accordingly, the Parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the Court reset the 26 deadline for completing a settlement conference to November 8, 2017. This deadline would 27 enable the Parties to schedule a later conference in which all defendants can participate, but which 28 9461-10\3359801 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (EDL) 2 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE 1 will still conclude before the next case management conference scheduled before the Court on 2 November 9. As such, the Parties stipulate and agree that there is good cause to grant the 3 requested extension, as it would further the goals of ADR here and also help conserve the 4 resources and time of the Court and the Parties. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED pursuant to Civ. L.R. 6-1(b) and 6-2. 7 DATED: September 6, 2017 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 8 By: 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 /s/ Zachary J. Alinder Zachary J. Alinder SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff FITBIT, INC. 11 12 DATED: September 6, 2017 13 MAURIEL KAPOUYTIAN WOODS LLP By: 14 /s/ Jason R. Bartlett Jason R. Bartlett Mauriel Kapouytian Woods LLP 15 Attorneys for Defendants LAGUNA 2, LLC and JOEL BLANK 16 17 DATED: September 6, 2017 ONE LLP 18 By: 19 20 /s/ Stephen M. Lobbin Stephen M. Lobbin One LLP Attorneys for Defendants CALI RESOURCES, INC. and CARLOS KELVIN and GREAT VALUE, LLC 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3359801 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (EDL) 3 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, the deadline for the Parties to complete the settlement 3 conference shall be extended from October 13, 2017 to November 8, 2017. IT IS SO 4 ORDERED. Status conference is reset from 11/9/2017 to 5 Tuesday 11/21/2017 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint status report shall be filed by 11/14/2017. 6 7 S ER 14 R NIA A 13 n M. Che FO 12 dward Judge E LI UNIT ED O IT IS S DIFIED AS MO H ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 11 RT LAW OFFICES 10 EDWARD M. CHEN ED United States District Judge ORDER NO SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 9/8/2017 RT U O 8 Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3359801 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (EDL) 4 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE 1 ECF ATTESTATION 2 I, Zachary J. Alinder, attest that concurrence in e-filing this JOINT STIPULATED 3 REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO BRIEFLY EXTEND SETTLEMENT 4 CONFERENCE DEADLINE PURSUANT TO CIV. L.R. 6-1(B) AND 6-2 has been obtained 5 from the signatories above, in compliance with Civil L.R. 5.1. 6 7 DATED: September 6, 2017 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 8 By: 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 /s/ Zachary J. Alinder Zachary J. Alinder SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff FITBIT, INC. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3359801 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC (EDL) 5 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST AND ORDER TO EXTEND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEADLINE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?