Fitbit, Inc. v. Laguna 2, LLC et al

Filing 117

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 111 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER SECOND STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR MI TECH AND MERCHANT KING DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Innovative Enterprises, Inc. dba The Merchant King, Amir Tafreshi, MI Technologies, Inc. dba Discount Merchant, Joubin Rahimi. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/15/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2017)

1 Roy A. Katriel (SBN 265463)
THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM, P.C.

2 4225 Executive Square, Suite 600
3 La Jolla, California 92037
4
5
6
7

Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]

Counsel for MI Technologies, Inc. dba Discount Merchant,
Amir Tafreshi, Innovative Enterprises, Inc. dba The
Merchant King, and Joubin Rahimi

8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13

FITBIT, INC., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15

Case No. 3:17-cv-00079 EMC

v.
LAGUNA 2, LLC, a New Jersey Limited

16 Liability Company; JOEL BLANK, an

individual; CALI RESOURCES, INC. dba

17 BUY NOW FACTORY DIRECT, a California
Corporation; CARLOS KELVIN, an

18 individual; GREAT VALUE, LLC, a

SECOND STIPULATION AND
[PRPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS MI
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. dba DISCOUNT
MERCHANT, AMIR TAFRESHI,
INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISES, INC. dba
THE MERCHANT KING, AND JOUBIN
RAHIMI TO RESPOND TO SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT

California Limited Liability Company; P-

19 COVE ENTERPRISES INC. dba BUYERS
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Honorable Edward M. Chen

CONSULTATION SERVICE, a California
Corporation; ENVIRONMENTAL
LIQUIDATION, INC., a California
Corporation; JONATHAN MANHAN, an
individual; FRANCIS MICHAEL BAKER aka
MIKE BAKER, an individual; MI
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. dba DISCOUNT
MERCHANT, a California Corporation,
AMIR TAFRESHI, an individual,
INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISES, INC. dba
THE MERCHANT KING, a California
Corporation; JOUBIN RAHIMI, an individual,
and DOES 12-30, inclusive,
Defendants.

28
SECOND STIP. ENLARGING TIME
TO RESPOND TO SAC
NO. 3:17-CV-00079-EMC

1
2

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(a), Plaintiff Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”) and Defendants MI

3 Technologies, Inc. dba Discount Merchant, Amir Tafreshi, Innovative Enterprises, Inc. dba The
4 Merchant King, and Joubin Rahimi (collectively, the “MI Tech and Merchant King Defendants”
5 and together with Fitbit, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby
6 stipulate as follows:
7

WHEREAS, MI Tech and Merchant King Defendants agreed to accept service of the

8 Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), ECF No. 92, through their counsel on July 24, 2017;
9

WHEREAS, on July 25, 2017, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), the Parties filed a

10 Stipulation extending until September 13, 2017 the time for the MI Tech and Merchant King
11 Defendants to respond to the SAC [Dkt. No. 95];
12

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties have engaged in meaningful settlement discussions;

13

WHEREAS, counsel for the parties believe that a further moderate extension of time for

14 the MI Tech and Merchant King Defendants would be productive in permitting counsel to
15 continue the settlement communications and determine whether there is a reasonable prospect of
16 resolving the claims against the MI Tech and Merchant King Defendants without protracted
17 litigation;
18

WHEREAS, the further extension being sought will not affect any pending Court dates;

19

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties,

20 through their respective counsel, that the deadline by which the MI Tech and Merchant King
21 Defendants must answer or otherwise respond to the SAC shall be further extended to October 2,
22 2017.
23 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
24
25
26
27
28
2

SECOND STIP. ENLARGING TIME
TO RESPOND TO SAC
NO. 3:17-CV-00079-EMC

1
2
3 DATED: September 11, 2017
4
5
6

THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM
By: /s/ Roy A. Katriel
Roy A. Katriel
Attorneys for Defendants
MI Technologies, Inc. dba Discount Merchant,
Amir Tafreshi, Innovative Enterprises, Inc. dba
The Merchant King, and Joubin Rahimi

7
8 DATED: September 11, 2017
9
10

SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
By : /s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Zachary J. Alinder
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Fitbit, Inc.

/

11
S DISTRICT
TE
C
A
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. T
13

12

UNIT
ED

S

RT
U
O

9/15
15 Dated: ___________________, 2017

R NIA

DERED
SO OR
IT IS
By:______________________________

14

Hon. Edward M. Chen,
U.S. District Judge M. Chen
dward
Judge E

18
19

A

H

ER

LI

RT

17

FO

NO

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

SECOND STIP. ENLARGING TIME
TO RESPOND TO SAC
NO. 3:17-CV-00079-EMC

1
2

ECF ATTESTATION
I, Roy A. Katriel, attest that concurrence in e-filing this SECOND STIPULATION

3 EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS MI TECHNOLOGIES, AMIR TAFRESHI,
4 INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISES, AND JOUBIN RAHIMI TO RESPOND TO SECOND
5 AMENDED COMPLAINT has been obtained from the signatories above, in compliance with
6 Civil L.R. 5.1.
7
8

/s/ Roy A. Katriel
THE KATRIEL LAW FIRM, P.C.
4225 Executive Square, Suite 600
La Jolla, California 92037
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
e-mail: [e-mail]

9
10
11
12

Counsel for MI Technologies, Inc. dba
Discount Merchant, Amir Tafreshi,
Innovative Enterprises, Inc. dba The
Merchant King, and Joubin Rahimi

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4

SECOND STIP. ENLARGING TIME
TO RESPOND TO SAC
NO. 3:17-CV-00079-EMC