Fitbit, Inc. v. Laguna 2, LLC et al

Filing 91

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 90 To Extend Time For Fitbit To File Second Amended Complaint filed by Fitbit, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/14/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2017)

Download PDF
1 JEFFREY C. HALLAM (State Bar No. 161259) E-Mail: jhallam@sideman.com 2 ZACHARY J. ALINDER (State Bar No. 209009) E-Mail: zalinder@sideman.com 3 ELLEN P. LIU (State Bar No. 280459) Email: eliu@sideman.com 4 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP One Embarcadero Center, Twenty-Second Floor 5 San Francisco, California 94111-3711 Telephone: (415) 392-1960 (415) 392-0827 6 Facsimile: 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant FITBIT, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FITBIT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC v. 14 LAGUNA 2, LLC, A New Jersey Limited Liability Company; JOEL BLANK, an 15 individual; CALI RESOURCES, INC., a California Corporation; CARLOS KELVIN, 16 an individual; and, DOES 3-30, inclusive, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen Dept.: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor Defendants. 17 18 CALI RESOURCES, INC., a California 19 Corporation, 20 21 Counterclaimant, v. 22 FITBIT, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 23 Counter-Defendant. 24 25 26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”), 27 Defendant and Counterclaimant Cali Resources, Inc. and Defendant Carlos Kelvin (together 28 “Cali”), and Defendants Laguna 2, LLC and Joel Blank (together, “L2” and collectively with 9461-10\3281837 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 Fitbit and Cali, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate 2 as follows: 3 WHEREAS, Fitbit currently has until July 14, 2017 to file its Second Amended Complaint; 4 WHEREAS, Fitbit’s counsel has requested a short extension of time from counsel for L2 5 and Cali to finalize the amendment, and hopefully also avoid the need for further amendments in 6 the future; 7 WHEREAS, neither L2 nor Cali has any objection to allowing Fitbit a week extension to 8 file its Second Amended Complaint; and, WHEREAS, the proposed one week extension will not alter the date of any event or any 10 deadline already fixed by Court Order. ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 11 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties, 12 through their respective counsel of record, that Fitbit’s deadline to respond to file its Second 13 Amended Complaint should be extended by one week to July 21, 2017. 14 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 15 DATED: July 12, 2017 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 16 By: /s/ Zachary J. Alinder Zachary J. Alinder Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant FITBIT, INC. 17 18 19 DATED: July 12, 2017 20 MAURIEL KAPOUYTIAN WOODS LLP By: 21 22 23 DATED: July 12, 2017 24 /s/ Sherman Kahn Sherman Kahn Attorneys for Defendants LAGUNA 2, LLC and JOEL BLANK ONE LLP By: /s/ Stephen M. Lobbin Stephen M. Lobbin Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants CALI RESOURCES, INC. and CARLOS KELVIN 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3281837 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT NO 6 RT 7 9 ER A N F D IS T IC T O R C 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES EDWARD M. CHEN . C Judge United StatesaDistrict hen dw rd M Judge E H 8 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 7/14/17 FO 5 Dated: D RDERE OO IT IS S LI 4 UNIT ED 3 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 2 R NIA 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3281837 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 ECF ATTESTATION 2 I, Zachary J. Alinder, attest that concurrence in e-filing this STIPULATION AND 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED 4 COMPLAINT has been obtained from the signatories above, in compliance with Civil L.R. 5.1. 5 6 DATED: July 12, 2017 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 7 By: 8 /s/ Zachary J. Alinder Zachary J. Alinder SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant FITBIT, INC. 10 ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711 LAW OFFICES SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9461-10\3281837 Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?