Fitbit, Inc. v. Laguna 2, LLC et al
Filing
91
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 90 To Extend Time For Fitbit To File Second Amended Complaint filed by Fitbit, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/14/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/14/2017)
1 JEFFREY C. HALLAM (State Bar No. 161259)
E-Mail:
jhallam@sideman.com
2 ZACHARY J. ALINDER (State Bar No. 209009)
E-Mail:
zalinder@sideman.com
3 ELLEN P. LIU (State Bar No. 280459)
Email:
eliu@sideman.com
4 SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
One Embarcadero Center, Twenty-Second Floor
5 San Francisco, California 94111-3711
Telephone:
(415) 392-1960
(415) 392-0827
6 Facsimile:
7 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
FITBIT, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711
LAW OFFICES
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 FITBIT, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC
v.
14 LAGUNA 2, LLC, A New Jersey Limited
Liability Company; JOEL BLANK, an
15 individual; CALI RESOURCES, INC., a
California Corporation; CARLOS KELVIN,
16 an individual; and, DOES 3-30, inclusive,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR FITBIT
TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Judge: Honorable Edward M. Chen
Dept.: Courtroom 5, 17th Floor
Defendants.
17
18
CALI RESOURCES, INC., a California
19 Corporation,
20
21
Counterclaimant,
v.
22 FITBIT, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
23
Counter-Defendant.
24
25
26
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Fitbit, Inc. (“Fitbit”),
27 Defendant and Counterclaimant Cali Resources, Inc. and Defendant Carlos Kelvin (together
28 “Cali”), and Defendants Laguna 2, LLC and Joel Blank (together, “L2” and collectively with
9461-10\3281837
Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
1 Fitbit and Cali, the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate
2 as follows:
3
WHEREAS, Fitbit currently has until July 14, 2017 to file its Second Amended Complaint;
4
WHEREAS, Fitbit’s counsel has requested a short extension of time from counsel for L2
5 and Cali to finalize the amendment, and hopefully also avoid the need for further amendments in
6 the future;
7
WHEREAS, neither L2 nor Cali has any objection to allowing Fitbit a week extension to
8 file its Second Amended Complaint; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed one week extension will not alter the date of any event or any
10 deadline already fixed by Court Order.
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711
LAW OFFICES
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
9
11
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties,
12 through their respective counsel of record, that Fitbit’s deadline to respond to file its Second
13 Amended Complaint should be extended by one week to July 21, 2017.
14 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
15 DATED: July 12, 2017
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
16
By:
/s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Zachary J. Alinder
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
FITBIT, INC.
17
18
19 DATED: July 12, 2017
20
MAURIEL KAPOUYTIAN WOODS LLP
By:
21
22
23 DATED: July 12, 2017
24
/s/ Sherman Kahn
Sherman Kahn
Attorneys for Defendants
LAGUNA 2, LLC and JOEL BLANK
ONE LLP
By:
/s/ Stephen M. Lobbin
Stephen M. Lobbin
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants
CALI RESOURCES, INC. and CARLOS KELVIN
25
26
27
28
9461-10\3281837
Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
NO
6
RT
7
9
ER
A
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
10
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711
LAW OFFICES
EDWARD M. CHEN
. C Judge
United StatesaDistrict hen
dw rd M
Judge E
H
8
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
7/14/17
FO
5 Dated:
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
4
UNIT
ED
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
2
R NIA
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9461-10\3281837
Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
1
ECF ATTESTATION
2
I, Zachary J. Alinder, attest that concurrence in e-filing this STIPULATION AND
3 [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED
4 COMPLAINT has been obtained from the signatories above, in compliance with Civil L.R. 5.1.
5
6 DATED: July 12, 2017
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
7
By:
8
/s/ Zachary J. Alinder
Zachary J. Alinder
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
FITBIT, INC.
10
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, 22ND FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3711
LAW OFFICES
SIDEMAN & BANCROFT LLP
9
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9461-10\3281837
Case No. 3:17-cv-00079-EMC
4
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FITBIT TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?