Chris Azpeitia et al v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Samantha West, Chris Azpeitia, Eileen Foster, Antonio Garcia. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 25, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/25/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

JAY SMITH (CA Bar No. 166105)
(Email: [e-mail])
JOSHUA F. YOUNG (CA Bar No. 232995)
(Email: [e-mail])
PUI-YEE YU (CA Bar No. 308122)
(Email: [e-mail])
GILBERT & SACKMAN
A LAW CORPORATION
3699 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1200
Los Angeles, California 90010
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
RANDY RENICK (CA Bar No. 179652)
(Email: [e-mail])
CORNELIA DAI (CA Bar No. 207435)
(Email: [e-mail])
HADSELL STORMER & RENICK, LLP
128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Suite 204
Pasadena, California 91103-3645
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
[Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page]

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO

17
18
19

CHRIS AZPEITIA, EILEEN FOSTER, ANTONIO
GARCIA, APRIL MOORE, and SAMANTHA
SCOTT, individually and on behalf of all similarly
situated current and former employees,

20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiffs,
v.
TESORO REFINING AND MARKETING
COMPANY LLC, TESORO LOGISTICS GP,
LLC, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,

Case No. 3:17-cv-00123-JST
Assigned to the Hon. Jon S. Tigar
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE:
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants.

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
William J. Dritsas (SBN 97523)
[e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105-2930
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Michael W. Kopp (SBN 206385)
[e-mail]
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

13

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Timothy M. Rusche (SBN 230036)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Mary Manesis (SBN 150372)
E-mail: [e-mail]
333 S. Hope Street, Suite 3900
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

14

Attorneys for Defendants

10
11
12

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b) and L.R. 6-2, the undersigned counsel of record for Plaintiffs Chris

2

Azpeitia, Eileen Foster, Antonio Garcia, April Moore, Samantha Scott, and Defendant Tesoro Refining

3

and Marketing Company LLC, Tesoro Logistics GP, LLC jointly file this Stipulation and agree as

4

follows:

5

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint on March 31, 2017;

6

WHEREAS Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint on

7

April 14, 2017;

8
9

WHEREAS Defendant’s motion to dismiss raises complex issues and the parties require
additional time to respond;

10
11

WHEREAS Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss within 21
days after the Motion was filed;

12
13

WHEREAS Defendants shall file their reply brief within 14 days after Plaintiffs’ Opposition is
filed;

14

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall remain as set by the Court;

15

THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT,

16

1.

17

Plaintiffs shall file their Opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss by no later than
May 5, 2017;

18

2.

19

Defendants shall file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss by no later than
May 19, 2017; and

20

3.

21

The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall remain on June 15, 2017, at 2:00
p.m.

22

///

23

///

24

///

25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED

2
3

DATED: April 21, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

4

HADSELL STORMER & RENICK, LLP

5

GILBERT & SACKMAN, A LAW CORPORATION

6

By:

7
8

DATED: April 21, 2017

9

/s/-Randy Renick
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
By:

10
11
12
13

/s/- Michael W. Kopp
Attorneys for Defendants

Attestation Regarding Signatures:
I, Randy Renick, hereby attest that all other signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is
submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing.

14

By:

15

/s/-Randy Renick
Randy Renick

16
17
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER

19
20

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24
25

Dated: April 25, 2017
THE HONORABLE JON S. TIGAR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROP] ORDER TO CONTINUE BRIEFING SCHEDULE
RE: MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ 1ST AMD COMPLAINT