French v. Fanning

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/21/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)

Download PDF
8 RT ER H 10 s na Jame aria-Ele Judge M NO 9 TED GRAN Attorneys for Defendant N 11 MAUREEN FRENCH, 14 Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 ERIC FANNING, Secretary of the Army, 17 Defendant. 18 F D IS T IC T O R C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 GRANTED. Case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dated: 8/21/2017 R NIA 7 RT U O 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA FO 5 Plaintiff (pro se) LI 4 A 3 MAUREEN FRENCH 1448 Purdue Street San Leandro, CA 94579 Telephone: (224) 659-3096 peec2all@gmail.com S 2 CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR. Director BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI Assistant Director ANDREW W. LAMB Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Civil Division Commercial Litigation Branch P.O. Box 480, Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Telephone: (202) 616-0465 Facsimile: (202) 307-0972 Andrew.Lamb@usdoj.gov UNIT ED 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 17-CV-153-MEJ STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES TO DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), plaintiff Maureen French and defendant Eric 19 Fanning, Secretary of the Army, hereby voluntarily stipulate and agree to the dismissal, with 20 prejudice, of the complaint in the above-captioned action. 21 22 23 Stipulation To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice 17-CV-153-MEJ 1 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that, on August 21, 2017, I caused a copy of the foregoing stipulation to 3 be deposited in the U.S. mail (first-class, postage prepaid), addressed to: Maureen French, 1448 4 Purdue Street, San Leandro, CA 94579. 5 /s/ Andrew W. Lamb 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Stipulation To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice 17-CV-153-MEJ 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?