French v. Fanning
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 8/21/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2017)
8
RT
ER
H
10
s
na Jame
aria-Ele
Judge M
NO
9
TED
GRAN
Attorneys for Defendant
N
11
MAUREEN FRENCH,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
ERIC FANNING, Secretary of the Army,
17
Defendant.
18
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
GRANTED.
Case is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.
Dated: 8/21/2017
R NIA
7
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
FO
5
Plaintiff (pro se)
LI
4
A
3
MAUREEN FRENCH
1448 Purdue Street
San Leandro, CA 94579
Telephone: (224) 659-3096
peec2all@gmail.com
S
2
CHAD A. READLER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
Civil Division
ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.
Director
BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI
Assistant Director
ANDREW W. LAMB
Trial Attorney
U.S. Department of Justice
Civil Division
Commercial Litigation Branch
P.O. Box 480, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044
Telephone: (202) 616-0465
Facsimile: (202) 307-0972
Andrew.Lamb@usdoj.gov
UNIT
ED
1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
17-CV-153-MEJ
STIPULATION BY ALL PARTIES
TO DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT
WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), plaintiff Maureen French and defendant Eric
19
Fanning, Secretary of the Army, hereby voluntarily stipulate and agree to the dismissal, with
20
prejudice, of the complaint in the above-captioned action.
21
22
23
Stipulation To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice
17-CV-153-MEJ
1
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that, on August 21, 2017, I caused a copy of the foregoing stipulation to
3
be deposited in the U.S. mail (first-class, postage prepaid), addressed to: Maureen French, 1448
4
Purdue Street, San Leandro, CA 94579.
5
/s/ Andrew W. Lamb
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Stipulation To Dismissal Of Complaint With Prejudice
17-CV-153-MEJ
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?