Aguilar v. Capital One Financial Corporation et al
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE filed by Trans Union, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 16, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2017)
4
Katherine Carlton Robinson, Esq. (IN #31694-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: krobinson@schuckitlaw.com
5
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
11
David Streza, Esq. (CSB #209353)
Vogl Meredith Burke LLP th
456 Montgomery Street, 20 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-398-0200
Fax: 415-398-2820
E-Mail: dstreza@vmbllp.com
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
) CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00211-JST
NICOLAS A. AGUILAR,
)
Plaintiff,
)
) STIPULATION AND
vs.
) [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
) EXTEND ADR DEADLINE
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION;
)
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.; )
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC;
)
and TRANS UNION, LLC,
)
Defendants.
)
)
22
23
Defendants Trans Union, LLC (“Trans Union”), Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
24
(“Experian”), Equifax Information Services, LLC (“Equifax”), Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
25
(“Capital One”), erroneously sued as Capital One Financial Corporation, and Plaintiff
26
(collectively, the “Parties”), by their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and respectfully
27
request that the Court extend the alternative dispute resolution (“ADR”) deadline by 60 days. In
28
support of this Stipulation, the Parties state:
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE – 4:17-CV-00211-JST
Page 1 of 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1.
This case was filed on January 19, 2017. See Doc. No. 1.
2.
Pursuant to the Court’s Order Selecting ADR Process [Doc. No. 35], the Parties
are to complete ADR by June 28, 2017.
3.
The Parties state that good cause exists to extend the deadline to complete ADR
as there has not yet been a Case Management Conference, the Parties are in the early stages of
8
discovery and are continuing to collect information relevant to the case, the Parties are engaging
9
in ongoing settlement discussions, and the Parties have thus far been unable to identify a
10
11
mediation date on which all Parties and the mediator are available.
4.
The Parties request that the Court extend the ADR deadline by 60 days so that
12
13
14
they may have more time to engage in direct settlement negotiations and conduct necessary
discovery before completing ADR.
15
5.
16
WHEREFORE the Parties respectfully request that the Court extend the deadline to
17
18
This is the first extension requested by any party.
complete ADR by 60 days.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE – 4:17-CV-00211-JST
Page 2 of 5
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
3
Date: May 8, 2017
4
5
6
7
s/ Katherine Carlton Robinson
Katherine Carlton Robinson, Esq. (IN #31694-49)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Schuckit & Associates, P.C.
4545 Northwestern Drive
Zionsville, IN 46077
Telephone: 317-363-2400
Fax: 317-363-2257
E-Mail: krobinson@schuckitlaw.com
Lead Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
8
9
12
David Streza, Esq. (CSB #209353)
Vogl Meredith Burke LLP th
456 Montgomery Street, 20 Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415-398-0200
Fax: 415-398-2820
E-Mail: dstreza@vmbllp.com
13
Local Counsel for Defendant Trans Union, LLC
10
11
14
15
Date: May 7, 2017
Matthew M. Loker (279939)
ml@kazlg.com
Kazerouni Law Group, APC
245 Fischer Avenue, Suite D1
Costa Mesa, CA
Telephone:
(800) 400-6808
Facsimile:
(800) 520-5523
16
17
18
19
Attorney for Plaintiff Nicolas Aguilar
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
s/ Matthew M. Loker
Date: May 2, 2017
s/ Andrew M. Cummings
Andrew M. Cummings (State Bar No. 305081)
acummings@jonesday.com
JONES DAY
3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 800
Irvine, CA 92612.4408
Telephone:
(949) 851-3939
Facsimile:
(949) 553-7539
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE – 4:17-CV-00211-JST
Page 3 of 5
1
2
Date: May 2, 2017
NOKES & QUINN
3
/s/ Thomas P. Quinn, Jr.
4
Thomas P. Quinn, Jr. (SBN 132268)
Nokes & Quinn APC
410 Broadway, Ste 200
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Tel: (949) 376-3500
Fax: (949) 376-3070
Email: tquinn@nokesquinn.com
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Date: May 2, 2017
s/ Connie Y. Tcheng
Connie Y. Tcheng (State Bar No. 228171)
ctcheng@dollamir.com
DOLL AMIR & ELEY LLP
1888 Century Park East, Suite 1850
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone:
(310) 557-9100
Facsimile:
(310) 557-9101
Attorneys for Defendant
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE – 4:17-CV-00211-JST
Page 4 of 5
complete ADR is hereby extended by 60 days.
4
JUDGE, United States District Court, Northern
District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
DISTRIBUTION TO:
Andrei Armas, Esq.
andrei@kazlg.com
Connie Tcheng, Esq.
ctcheng@dollarmir.com
Hunter Randolph Eley, Esq.
heley@dollarmir.com
Matthew M. Loker, Esq.
ml@kazlg.com
Thomas P. Quinn, Jr., Esq.
tquinn@nokesquinn.com
Katherine Carlton Robinson, Esq.
krobinson@schuckitlaw.com
FO
i ga r
LI
ER
H
10
RT
7
9
n S. T
J u d ge J o
NO
6
8
D
RDERE
S SO O
____________________________________
IT I
A
5
May 16, 2017
Date: ________________________
R NIA
3
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that the Parties’ deadline to
UNIT
ED
1
C
F
D IS T IC T O
Andrew Michael Cummings, Esq.
R
N
acummings@jonesday.com
David James Streza, Esq.
dstreza@vmbllp.com
Katherine E. Carlton Robinson, Esq.
krobinson@schuckitlaw.com
Michael Frederick Cordoza, Esq.
mike.cardoza@cardozalawcorp.com
Seyed Abbas Kazerounian, Esq.
ak@kazlg.com
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND ADR DEADLINE – 4:17-CV-00211-JST
Page 5 of 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?