Figueroa Zarceno v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Pedro Figueroa Zarceno filed by Pedro Figueroa Zarceno. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 5, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/5/2017)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Pedro Figueroa Zarceno,

CASE No C 3:17-cv-229

Plaintiff(s)
v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

City & Cty. of San Francisco, et al.,
Defendant(s)
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
■ Private ADR (specify process and provider)

JAMS
Mediation

Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct
mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an
early settlement conference with a Magistrate
Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this
form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR
L.R. 3-5.

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
■ the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR,

unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline:
Date: April 5, 2017
Date: April 5, 2017

/s/ Nicholas Y. Lin
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Newton Oldfather
Attorney for Defendant

X IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS:

Date: April 5, 2017
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed
Order Selecting Private ADR.”

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017