Betty Grinder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 15

AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (pursuant to 14 stipulation) by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING LITIGATION No. C 16-05674 WHA No. C 16-05676 WHA No. C 16-05679 WHA No. C 16-05694 WHA No. C 16-05701 WHA No. C 16-05704 WHA No. C 16-06315 WHA No. C 16-06335 WHA No. C 16-06363 WHA No. C 16-06372 WHA No. C 17-00343 WHA No. C 17-00506 WHA 12 13 14 15 16 17 AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 18 / 19 20 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated request for an extension of time for 21 defendants to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 14). Defendants in this action, Grinder v. 22 Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00343-WHA, are not required to join in the combined motion to dismiss 23 due on February 9, and shall have until 30 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned 24 motion to respond to the complaint. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 28 Dated: February 8, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?