Betty Grinder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (pursuant to 14 stipulation) by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING
No. C 16-05674 WHA
No. C 16-05676 WHA
No. C 16-05679 WHA
No. C 16-05694 WHA
No. C 16-05701 WHA
No. C 16-05704 WHA
No. C 16-06315 WHA
No. C 16-06335 WHA
No. C 16-06363 WHA
No. C 16-06372 WHA
No. C 17-00343 WHA
No. C 17-00506 WHA
The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated request for an extension of time for
defendants to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 14). Defendants in this action, Grinder v.
Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00343-WHA, are not required to join in the combined motion to dismiss
due on February 9, and shall have until 30 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned
motion to respond to the complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 8, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?