Betty Grinder v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 15

AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (pursuant to 14 stipulation) by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

IN RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS CREDIT REPORTING
LITIGATION

No. C 16-05674 WHA
No. C 16-05676 WHA
No. C 16-05679 WHA
No. C 16-05694 WHA
No. C 16-05701 WHA
No. C 16-05704 WHA
No. C 16-06315 WHA
No. C 16-06335 WHA
No. C 16-06363 WHA
No. C 16-06372 WHA
No. C 17-00343 WHA
No. C 17-00506 WHA

12
13
14
15
16
17

AMENDED CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER

18
/

19
20

The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated request for an extension of time for

21

defendants to respond to the complaint (Dkt. No. 14). Defendants in this action, Grinder v.

22

Experian, No. 3:17-cv-00343-WHA, are not required to join in the combined motion to dismiss

23

due on February 9, and shall have until 30 DAYS after the Court rules on the aforementioned

24

motion to respond to the complaint.

25
26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: February 8, 2017.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE