Six4three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY AND REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/14/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
SIX4THREE, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. C 17-00359 WHA
v.
FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation,
and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendant.
/
16
17
ORDER GRANTING
REQUEST TO FILE A
SURREPLY AND
REQUESTING RESPONSE
FROM PLAINTIFF
Facebook objects to Six4Three’s inclusion of seventeen exhibits appended to a reply
18
declaration in support of its motion to remand and to Six4Three’s use of excessive footnotes in
19
smaller than 12-point font and more than twenty-eight lines per page in an effort to squeeze new
20
arguments into its reply in violation of this Court’s formatting requirements. Facebook may
21
submit a surreply NOT TO EXCEED FIVE PAGES by FEBRUARY 15 AT 2:00 P.M..
22
Facebook may not use this surreply as an opportunity to restate its arguments in
23
opposition. Any material in the surreply not directed at new arguments or evidence raised for
24
the first time on reply will be stricken.
25
26
27
28
1
Additionally, by FEBRUARY 15 AT 2:00 P.M., plaintiff shall state unequivocally whether
2
it will rely in any way on any federal law to support its claims herein. The response must be
3
either “yes” or “no.” If the answer is “no,” plaintiff will be bound to that answer and on remand
4
may not rely on any federal law.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: February 14, 2017.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?