Six4three, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY AND REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Alsup on 2/14/17. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 SIX4THREE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. C 17-00359 WHA v. FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendant. / 16 17 ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE A SURREPLY AND REQUESTING RESPONSE FROM PLAINTIFF Facebook objects to Six4Three’s inclusion of seventeen exhibits appended to a reply 18 declaration in support of its motion to remand and to Six4Three’s use of excessive footnotes in 19 smaller than 12-point font and more than twenty-eight lines per page in an effort to squeeze new 20 arguments into its reply in violation of this Court’s formatting requirements. Facebook may 21 submit a surreply NOT TO EXCEED FIVE PAGES by FEBRUARY 15 AT 2:00 P.M.. 22 Facebook may not use this surreply as an opportunity to restate its arguments in 23 opposition. Any material in the surreply not directed at new arguments or evidence raised for 24 the first time on reply will be stricken. 25 26 27 28 1 Additionally, by FEBRUARY 15 AT 2:00 P.M., plaintiff shall state unequivocally whether 2 it will rely in any way on any federal law to support its claims herein. The response must be 3 either “yes” or “no.” If the answer is “no,” plaintiff will be bound to that answer and on remand 4 may not rely on any federal law. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: February 14, 2017. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?